((Sharyl Attkisson, the former CBS News correspondent who claims that her computers were hacked by the government while she was reporting on the Benghazi scandal, has released a video she took with her cellphone of one apparent hack. The video (above) was shared with POLITICO and appears to show words being deleted from her files without her control.))
Cảnh sát Mỹ hiện nay chặn xe, lục soát LẤY HẾT TIỀN của nạn nhân xong thả cho đi. John Anderson một nạn nhân mới nhất, đã liên tục nộp đơn kiện để lấy lại số tiền bị cảnh sát lấy.. nhưng vô vọng..Tòa án mặc nhiên cho phép cảnh sát tịch thu tiền mặt của bất cứ ai, dù không có LUẬT nào ngăn cấm dân chúng giữ tiền mặt (CASH), và cũng không có LUẬT nào cho phép cảnh sát tịch thu tiền mặt vô cớ!. "Chiến dịch" tịch thu tiền mặt phải chăng là cách hay nhất buộc mọi người phải LỆ THUỘC HỆ THỐNG THỂ LỰC NGÂN HÀNG để dễ kiểm soát? Chiến dịch "cướp sống tiền mặt" này đã khiến CANADA khuyến cáo dân Canada khi qua Mỹ "không nên" giữ tiền mặt. Chúng ta đều biết TIỀN MẶT (CASH) giúp chúng ta chi dụng thuận tiện khắp mọi nơi, những lúc ĐIỆN mất, những nơi không có máy tín dụng, và nhất là không phải trả lệ phí (transaction fee) chờ đợi. Hoặc khi mua bán chi trả trực tiếp những hàng hóa, dịch vụ giũa các cá nhân, tư nhân tại tư gia, như đồ cổ, bàn ghế tự làm (hand made furniture) thực phẩm tự nhiên (organic food) v.v. Không có tiền mặt, không thể trao đổi những hàng hóa, dịch vụ trong những trường hợp này! Một xã hội mà trong đó người dân KHÔNG CÒN ĐIỀU KIỆN TỰ DO TƯƠNG TÁC TRAO ĐỔI KINH TẾ TRỰC TIẾP với nhau, tất cả bị buộc phải thông qua định chế trung gian kiểm soát (ngân hàng, cửa hiệu, siêu thị) .. như vậy là tự do, tự chủ ???
Warning: Avoid This Corrupt, Third-World Country At All Costs
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 11/01/2014 - 17:02 John Anderson, an American tourist from San Clemente, California, was driving down a poorly-maintained highway when he saw flashing lights in his rearview mirror. After a brief exchange with the local police officer, Anderson was shocked when the cop started searching his vehicle. Anderson had $25,180 in US dollar cash in the car, which by the way was not a crime according to the local laws. When the cop saw it, he told Anderson that we would take it and threatened him with arrest if he protested. Ultimately Anderson gave in; the cop let him go and did not charge him with a crime, but took every last penny in the vehicle. And for the last two years, Anderson has been trying to unsuccessfully fight it in the country’s Kangaroo court system. Clearly we should all avoid going to such dangerously corrupt third world countries.Canada Warns its Citizens Not to Take Cash to USA
the7thfire.com/canada-warns-its-citizens-not-to-take-cash-to-usa/
Sep 27, 2014 - Money confiscated is usually allowed to be kept by the department who confiscated it. This is strangely working its way into funding police and pensions. ... deploying weaponized pandemics against innocent populations ...Across America, law enforcement officers — from federal agents to state troopers right down to sheriffs in one-street backwaters — are operating a vast, co-ordinated scheme to grab as much of the public’s cash as they can; “hand over fist,” to use the words of one police trainer.Basically, if you happen to be transporting any (attractive enough) amount of cash, Police feel empowered (and are encouraged) to seize the money from you - without any evidence of any crime having been committed.
Seizing suspected drug money has been legal here for decades, but after 9/11 police acquired a whole new set of powers and justifications. And they set about using them for profit. The Washington Post this week reported that in the past 13 years, there have been 61,998 cash seizures on roadways and elsewhere without use of search warrants. The total haul: $2.5 billion, divided pretty much equally between the U.S. government and state and local authorities (hence the Kafkaesque “equitable sharing” euphemism).Under the guise of the "War on Drugs" and the "War on Terror" police, it seems, are acting as Road Pirates...pilfering cash from unsuspecting citizens for their bosses - and in all likelihood pocketing portions for themselves.
Some, no doubt, were indeed drug dealers or money launderers and just walked away from the money. Others just couldn’t spare the expense and time of going to court. Of those who did, though, nearly half got their money back, a statistic that fairly screams about the legitimacy of the seizures. So does another fact: In many cases, authorities offer half the money back – money they’d claimed was proceeds of crime. And when they do issue a cheque, they almost always insist their victim sign a legal release promising never to sue.As the title of the article suggests, this is nothing more than an organized shakedown...let's just call it what it is - organized crime.
Police forces use the money to finance their departmental budgets, sometimes spending it on luxury vehicles, first-class tickets to conferences, and lavish quarters. They regard the money as rightfully theirs. One prosecutor used seized cash to defend herself against a lawsuit brought by people whose cash she seized.
This one is my personal favourite. Steal people's money, using the veil of "justice" as your cover, them beat the victims over the head with their own cash when they fight to get it back.
Someone...anyone...please tell me what has happened to America?
No comments:
Post a Comment