Omniwar: Phơi bày và chấm dứt cuộc tấn công vô hình vào nhân loại

Omniwar: Exposing and Ending the Invisible Attack on Humanity

By David A. Hughes

Table of Contents

Introduction
Part 1 – Contextualizing Developments Since 2020
Part 2 – World War III: Omniwar
Part 3 – Network-centric Warfare
Part 4 – Targeting the Brain
Part 5 – Engineering Human Beings
Part 6 – The “Covid-19” Era and the Internet of Bio-NanoThings
Part 7 – Conclusion

Introduction

A stealth war to enslave humanity is being waged from the cell to the stratosphere. It is like no war that has ever been seen before. It is a world war, yet most people have no idea it is taking place, or that it is being waged against them. It assumes the form of an Omniwar, waged across all domains of human life, but covertly, so that the public does not recognize it as such. Despite being everywhere all the time, the Omniwar paradoxically remains invisible, which is what makes it so potent. How can those caught up in it resist, if they do not know what is happening, cannot identify the enemy, and are unable to recognize the aims, strategies, tactics, and weaponry being deployed against them?

Effective resistance begins by seeing and understanding what we are facing. The purpose of this report is to explain why the Omniwar is taking place, who is behind it, what its goal is, and the covert methods and invisible weaponry it entails. Although the Omniwar was initiated, undeclared, in 2020, it must be seen in a wider context of military planning, dating back decades, for what a seminal NASA document refers to as the “IT/Bio/Nano” age (slide 13).¹ In simple terms, this is about connecting human bodies to an external network for purposes of technocratic monitoring and control. Should such a system be instituted globally, the result will be an inescapable, biodigital form of totalitarianism.

This report is in seven parts:

• Part 1 explains why the Omniwar is taking place, by showing that the existing control system, in place for decades, entered crisis in the years leading up to 2020, triggering a plan to initiate the rollout of its intended successor, global technocracy.
• Part 2 argues that social engineering on this scale can only be achieved through world war and that we are, therefore, in World War III, which looks nothing like the two previous world wars but, rather, takes the historically unprecedented form of the Omniwar, entailing the weaponization of everything.
• Part 3 turns to network-centric warfare, AI, and human bodies as nodes on the network, an idea which has become realizable via the Internet of BioNano Things, while the network itself is becoming inescapable.
• Part 4 explores military plans to target the human brain, coupled with the development of syringe-injectable neural nanotechnologies and smart dust, which are able to bring such plans to fruition.
• Part 5 is about engineering human beings to render them compatible with the Internet of BioNano Things: synthetic biology plays a key role, as does dual-use technology, with the military aspect being camouflaged by transhumanist false promises of “upgrading” human beings like software.
• Part 6 relates the preceding material to the contentious issue of the “Covid-19 vaccines” and their contents, arguing that the possibility of undisclosed nanotechnologies cannot be ruled out and that other delivery mechanisms could also be at work.
• Part 7 (the Conclusion) discusses the evil potential of weaponized neurotechnology, why it is important to adopt a war footing, what resistance in the Omniwar looks like, what practical steps can be taken, and why a positive vision of the future is needed.

Part 1 – Contextualizing Developments Since 2020

Pre-Covid: The System Enters Crisis

For decades, populations have been kept in check through a combination of four main factors:

1. Neoliberal economics
2. The international monetary and financial system
3. The propaganda system
4. The “War on Terror”

All of these control mechanisms entered crisis in the years leading up to 2020.

Neoliberal Economics

Between 1995 and 2021, 38% of global wealth growth accrued to the richest 1% (mostly to the richest 0.001%), while the poorest half of humanity received only 2% of the growth (Figure 1). This trend exacerbated inequalities in a world where the richest 10% controls 76% of the wealth, and the poorest half, again, accounts for a mere 2%.²

Figure 1. Average annual wealth growth rate, 1995–2021 Source: Chancel et al., 2022²

Clearly, neoliberal economics is a system that benefits the few at the expense of the many. In 2019, following years of “austerity,” massive social protests erupted in 35 different countries (one in five), reflecting “unprecedented political mobilization” worldwide.³ The “signs of revolution,” according to Kees van der Pijl (author of States of Emergency: Keeping the Global Population in Check, p. 72⁴), were too serious for the transnational ruling class to ignore.

Full reading, please go straight to the link:

 https://davidahughes.net/omniwar-exposing-and-ending-the-invisible/

 

Sự Suy tàn và Sụp đổ

Đế chế Anh, đã trên đà suy tàn nghiêm trọng vào đêm trước Thế chiến I, là một bài học cảnh báo cho Đế chế Mỹ đang suy yếu một thế kỷ sau đó. 

Sold Out - by Mr. Fish

Decline and Fall The British Empire, in steep decline on the eve of World War I, is a cautionary tale for a decayed U.S. Empire a century later. Chris Hedges Dec 27   READ IN APP   Subscribed At the start of the 20th century, the British Empire was, like our own, in terminal decline. Sixty percent of Englishmen were physically unfit for military service, as are 77 percent of American youth. The ruling Liberal Party, like the Democratic Party, while it acknowledged the need for reform, did little to address the economic and social inequalities that saw the working class condemned to live in substandard housing, breathe polluted air, be denied basic sanitation and health care and forced to work in punishing and poorly paid jobs. The Tory government, in response, formed an Inter-Departmental Committee on Physical Deterioration to examine the “deterioration of certain classes of the population,” meaning, of course, the urban poor. It became known as the report on “the degeneracy of our race.” Analogies were swiftly drawn, with much accuracy, with the decadence and degeneracy of the late Roman Empire. Rudyard Kipling, who romanticized and mythologized the British Empire and its military, in his 1902 poem “The Islanders,” warned the British that they had grown complacent and flaccid from hubris, indolence and privilege. They were unprepared to sustain the Empire. He despaired of the loss of martial spirit by the “sons of the sheltered city — unmade, unhandled, unmeet,” and called for mandatory conscription. He excoriated the British military for its increasing reliance on mercenaries and colonial troops, “the men who could shoot and ride,” just as mercenaries and militias increasingly augment American forces overseas. Kipling damned the British public for its preoccupation with “trinkets” and spectator sports, including “the flannel fools at the wicket or the muddied oafs at the goals,” athletes whom he believed should have been fighting in the war in South Africa. He foresaw in the succession of British military disasters during the South African Boer War, which had recently ended, the impending loss of British global dominance, much as the two decades of military fiascos in the Middle East have eroded U.S. hegemony. The preoccupation with physical decline, also interpreted as moral decline, is what led Secretary of War Pete Hegseth to decry “fat generals,” and order women in the military to meet the “highest male standards” for physical fitness. It is what is behind his “Warrior Ethos Tasking,” plans to enhance physical fitness, grooming standards and military readiness. U.S. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth speaks to senior military leaders at Marine Corps Base Quantico on September 30, 2025 in Quantico, Virginia. Almost 800 generals, admirals and their senior enlisted leaders were ordered into one location from around the world on short notice. (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)   We live in an eerily similar historical moment. Britain, within 12 years of Kipling’s lament, was plunged into the collective suicide of World War I, a conflict that took the lives of over a million British and Commonwealth troops and doomed the British Empire. H.G. Wells, who anticipated trench warfare, tanks and machine guns, was one of the very few to see where Britain was headed. In 1908, he wrote “The War in the Air.” He warned that future wars would not be limited to antagonistic nation-states but would become global. These wars, as was true in the 1935 Italian invasion of Ethiopia, the Spanish Civil War and World War II, would carry out the indiscriminate aerial bombardment of civilians. He also foresaw in “The World Set Free,” the dropping of atomic bombs. Subscribed Nearly one third of the population in Edwardian England endured abject poverty. The cause, as Seebohm Rowntree noted in his study of the slums, was not, as conservatives claimed, alcoholism, laziness, a lack of initiative or responsibility by the poor, but because “the wages paid for unskilled labour in York are insufficient to provide food, shelter, and clothing adequate to maintain a family of moderate size in a state of bare physical efficiency.” The U.S. has one of the highest rates of poverty among Western industrialized nations, estimated by many economists at far above the official figure of 10.6 percent. In real terms, some 41 percent of Americans are poor or low-income, with 67 percent living paycheck to paycheck. British eugenicists from the Galton Laboratory for National Eugenics — which was funded by Sir Francis Galton, who coined the term “eugenics” — advocated “positive eugenics,” the “improvement” of the race by encouraging those deemed superior — always white members of the middle and upper classes — to have large families. “Negative eugenics” was advocated to limit the number of children born to those deemed “unfit.” This would be achieved through sterilization and the separation of genders. Winston Churchill, who was home secretary in the liberal government of H.H. Asquith in 1910-11, backed the forced sterilization of the “feeble minded,” calling them a “national and race danger” and “the source from which the stream of madness is fed.” The Trump White House, led by Stephen Miller, is intent on carrying out a similar culling of American society. Those endowed with “negative” hereditary traits — based usually on race — are condemned as human contaminants that an army of masked Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents are terrorizing, incarcerating and purging from society. Miller, in emails leaked in 2019, lauds the 1973 novel “The Camp of the Saints,” written by Jean Raspail. It chronicles a flotilla of South Asian people who invade France and destroy Western civilization. The immigrants, who the Trump administration are now hunting down, are described as “kinky-haired, swarthy-skinned, long-despised phantoms” and “teeming ants toiling for the white man’s comfort.” The South Asian mobs are “grotesque little beggars from the streets of Calcutta,” led by a feces-eating “gigantic Hindu” known as “the turd eater.” This, in its most scurrilous form, is the thesis of the “Great Replacement” theory, the belief that the white races in Europe and North America are being “replaced” by “lesser breeds of the earth.” Donald Trump boasts that he will be the “fertilization president.” American couples — meaning white couples — will be given incentives by his administration to have more children to counter declining birth rates. In the vernacular of the right wing, those who promote this updated version of “positive eugenics” are known as “pronatalists.” The Trump administration will also reduce refugees admitted to the United States next year to the token level of 7,500, with most of these spots filled by white South Africans. Trump’s allies in Big Tech are busy creating the fertility infrastructure to conceive children with “positive” hereditary traits. Sam Altman, who has been awarded a one-year military contract worth $200 million from the Trump administration, has invested in technology to allow parents to gene edit their children before conception to produce “designer babies.” Peter Thiel, the co-founder of Palantir, which is facilitating the Trump administration’s mass deportation efforts, has backed an embryo screening company called Orchid Health. Orchid promises to help parents design “healthy” children through embryo testing and selection technology. Elon Musk, a fervent pronatalist and believer in the Great Replacement theory, is reportedly a client of the startup. The goal is to empower parents to screen embryos for IQ and select “their children’s intelligence before birth,” as the Wall Street Journal notes. We are making the same self-defeating mistakes made by the British political class that oversaw the decline of the British Empire and orchestrated the suicidal folly of World War I. We blame the poor for their own impoverishment. We believe in the superiority of the white race over other races, crushing the plethora of voices, cultures and experiences that create a dynamic society. We seek to counter injustices, along with economic and social inequality, with hypermasculinity, militarism and force, which accelerates the internal decay and propels us toward a disastrous global war, perhaps, in our case, with China. Wells scoffed at the idiocy of an entitled ruling class that was unable to analyze or address the social problems it had created. He excoriated the British political elite for its ignorance and ineptitude. They had vulgarized democracy, he wrote, with their racism, hypernationalism and simplistic cliché-ridden public discourse, stoked by a sensationalist tabloid press. When a crisis came, Wells warned, these mandarins, like our own, would set the funeral pyre of empire alight. Wells cảnh báo rằng, khi một cuộc khủng hoảng xảy ra, những quan chức cấp cao này, giống như những quan chức của chính chúng ta, sẽ châm ngọn lửa thiêu rụi đế chế.

2025 Year in Review – #SolutionsWatch

Consumerism is the Perfection of Slavery - Prof Jiang Xueqin

TheTinyDot

‘Gaza Is Over, It’s Gone. There’s Nothing Left' | Aaron Bastani meets Norman Finkelstein

Kẻ Thù Từ Bên Trong

Ngành công nghiệp chiến tranh, một quốc gia trong một quốc gia, phá hoại quốc gia, vấp phải thất bại quân sự này đến thất bại quân sự tiếp theo, tước bỏ các quyền tự do dân sự của chúng ta và đẩy chúng ta đến các cuộc chiến tự sát với Nga và Trung Quốc.

Mỹ là một  chế độ quân chủ , một hình thức chính phủ do quân đội thống trị. Một tiên đề giữa hai đảng cầm quyền là phải thường xuyên chuẩn bị cho chiến tranh. Ngân sách khổng lồ của cỗ máy chiến tranh là bất khả xâm phạm. Hàng tỷ đô la  lãng phí và gian lận của nó  bị bỏ qua. Những thất bại quân sự của nó ở Đông Nam Á, Trung Á và Trung Đông đã biến mất vào hang động rộng lớn của chứng mất trí nhớ lịch sử. Chứng mất trí nhớ này, có nghĩa là không bao giờ có trách nhiệm giải trình, cho phép cỗ máy chiến tranh mổ xẻ đất nước về mặt kinh tế và đẩy Đế chế vào hết cuộc xung đột tự đánh bại mình đến cuộc xung đột tự đánh bại mình. Các nhà quân phiệt giành chiến thắng trong mọi cuộc bầu cử. Họ không thể thua. Không thể bỏ phiếu chống lại họ. Tình trạng chiến tranh là một Götterdämmerung, như Dwight Macdonald viết, “không có các vị thần”.

Bi kịch không phải là trạng thái chiến tranh của Hoa Kỳ sẽ tự hủy diệt. Bi kịch là chúng ta sẽ hạ gục rất nhiều người vô tội cùng với chúng ta.

The Enemy From Within. Chris Hedges

The war industry, a state within a state, disembowels the nation, stumbles from one military fiasco to the next, strips us of civil liberties and pushes us towards suicidal wars with Russia and China.

ScheerPost 30 April 2023

America is a stratocracy, a form of government dominated by the military. It is axiomatic among the two ruling parties that there must be a constant preparation for war. The war machine’s massive budgets are sacrosanct. Its billions of dollars in waste and fraud are ignored. Its military fiascos in Southeast Asia, Central Asia and the Middle East have disappeared into the vast cavern of historical amnesia. This amnesia, which means there is never accountability, licenses the war machine to economically disembowel the country and drive the Empire into one self-defeating conflict after another. The militarists win every election. They cannot lose. It is impossible to vote against them. The war state is a Götterdämmerung, as Dwight Macdonald writes, “without the gods.”

Since the end of the Second World War, the federal government has spent more than half its tax dollars on past, current and future military operations. It is the largest single sustaining activity of the government. Military systems are sold before they are produced with guarantees that huge cost overruns will be covered. Foreign aid is contingent on buying U.S. weapons. Egypt, which receives some $1.3 billion in foreign military financing, is required to devote it to buying and maintaining U.S. weapons systems. Israel has received $158 billion in bilateral assistance from the U.S. since 1949, almost all of it since 1971 in the form of military aid, with most of it going towards arms purchases from U.S. weapons manufacturers. The American public funds the research, development and building of weapons systems and then buys these same weapons systems on behalf of foreign governments. It is a circular system of corporate welfare. 

Between October 2021 and September 2022, the U.S. spent $877 billion on the military, that’s more than the next 10 countries, including China, Russia, Germany, France and the United Kingdom combined. These huge military expenditures, along with the rising costs of a for-profit healthcare system, have driven the U.S. national debt to over $31 trillion, nearly $5 trillion more than the U.S.’s entire Gross Domestic Product (GDP). This imbalance is not sustainable, especially once the dollar is no longer the world’s reserve currency. As of January 2023, the U.S. spent a record $213 billion servicing the interest on its national debt. 

The public, bombarded with war propaganda, cheers on their self-immolation. It revels in the despicable beauty of our military prowess. It speaks in the thought-terminating clichés spewed out by mass culture and mass media. It imbibes the illusion of omnipotence and wallows in self-adulation.

The intoxication of war is a plague. It imparts an emotional high that is impervious to logic, reason or fact. No nation is immune. The gravest mistake made by European socialists on the eve of the First World War was the belief that the working classes of France, Germany, Italy, the Austro-Hungarian Empire, Russia and Great Britain would not be divided into antagonistic tribes because of disputes between imperialist governments. They would not, the socialists assured themselves, sign on for the suicidal slaughter of millions of working men in the trenches. Instead, nearly every socialist leader walked away from their anti-war platform to back their nation’s entry into the war. The handful who did not, such as Rosa Luxemburg, were sent to prison.

Six Reasons Why China and Russia Are Catching Up with the U.S. Military

A society dominated by militarists distorts its social, cultural, economic and political institutions to serve the interests of the war industry. The essence of the military is masked with subterfuges — using the military to carry out humanitarian relief missions, evacuating civilians in danger, as we see in the Sudan, defining military aggression as “humanitarian intervention” or a way to protect democracy and liberty, or lauding the military as carrying out a vital civic function by teaching leadership, responsibility, ethics and skills to young recruits. The true face of the military — industrial slaughter — is hidden.

The mantra of the militarized state is national security. If every discussion begins with a question of national security, every answer includes force or the threat of force. The preoccupation with internal and external threats divides the world into friend and foe, good and evil. Militarized societies are fertile ground for demagogues. Militarists, like demagogues, see other nations and cultures in their own image – threatening and aggressive. They seek only domination. 

It was not in our national interest to wage war for two decades across the Middle East. It is not in our national interest to go to war with Russia or China. But militarists need war the way a vampire needs blood.

After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Mikhail Gorbachev and later Vladimir Putin lobbied to be integrated into western economic and military alliances. An alliance that included Russia would have nullified the calls to expand NATO — which the U.S. had promised it  would not do beyond the borders of a unified Germany — and have made it impossible to convince countries in eastern and central Europe to spend billions on U.S. military hardware. Moscow’s requests were rebuffed. Russia was made the enemy, whether it wanted to be or not. None of this made us more secure. Washington’s decision to interfere in Ukraine’s domestic affairs by backing a coup in 2014 triggered a civil war and Russia’s subsequent invasion. 

But for those who profit from war, antagonizing Russia, like antagonizing China, is a good business model. Northrop Grumman and Lockheed Martin saw their stock prices increase by 40 percent and 37 percent respectively as a result of the Ukraine conflict. 

A war with China, now an industrial giant, would disrupt the global supply chain with devastating effects on the U.S. and global economy. Apple produces 90 percent of its products in China. U.S. trade with China was $690.6 billion last year. In 2004, U.S. manufacturing output was more than twice China’s. China’s output is now nearly double that of the United States. China produces the largest number of ships, steel and smartphones in the world. It dominates the global production of chemicals, metals, heavy industrial equipment and electronics. It is the world’s largest rare earth mineral exporter, its greatest reserve holder and is responsible for 80 percent of its refining worldwide. Rare earth minerals are essential to the manufacture of computer chips, smartphones, television screens, medical equipment, fluorescent light bulbs, cars, wind turbines, smart bombs, fighter jets and satellite communications. 

War with China would result in massive shortages of a variety of goods and resources, some vital to the war industry, paralyzing U.S. businesses. Inflation and unemployment would rocket upwards. Rationing would be implemented. The global stock exchanges, at least in the short term, would be shut down. It would trigger a global depression. If the U.S. Navy was able to block oil shipments to China and disrupt its sea lanes, the conflict could potentially become nuclear.

In “NATO 2030: Unified for a New Era,” the military alliance sees the future as a battle for hegemony with rival states, especially China. It calls for the preparation of prolonged global conflict. In October 2022, Air Force General Mike Minihan, head of Air Mobility Command, presented his “Mobility Manifesto” to a packed military conference. During this unhinged fearmongering diatribe, Minihan argued that if the U.S. does not dramatically escalate its preparations for a war with China, America’s children will find themselves “subservient to a rules based order that benefits only one country [China].”

According to the New York Times, the Marine Corps is training units for beach assaults, where the Pentagon believes the first battles with China may occur, across “the first island chain” that includes, “Okinawa and Taiwan down to Malaysia as well as the South China Sea and disputed islands in the Spratlys and the Paracels.”.

Militarists drain funds from social and infrastructure programs. They pour money into research and development of weapons systems and neglect renewable energy technologies. Bridges, roads, electrical grids and levees collapse. Schools decay. Domestic manufacturing declines. The public is impoverished. The harsh forms of control the militarists test and perfect abroad migrate back to the homeland. Militarized Police. Militarized drones. Surveillance. Vast prison complexes. Suspension of basic civil liberties. Censorship.

Those such as Julian Assange, who challenge the stratocracy, who expose its crimes and suicidal folly, are ruthlessly persecuted. But the war state harbors within it the seeds of its own destruction. It will cannibalize the nation until it collapses. Before then, it will lash out, like a blinded cyclops, seeking to restore its diminishing power through indiscriminate violence. The tragedy is not that the U.S. war state will self-destruct. The tragedy is that we will take down so many innocents with us.

*

Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

Chris Hedges is a Pulitzer Prize–winning journalist who was a foreign correspondent for fifteen years for The New York Times, where he served as the Middle East Bureau Chief and Balkan Bureau Chief for the paper. He previously worked overseas for The Dallas Morning News, The Christian Science Monitor, and NPR. He is the host of show The Chris Hedges Report.