Nước Mỹ, Người Mỹ như một Đứa Trẻ Ăn Vạ

Nước Mỹ, sau Thế chiến 2, không chỉ trở thành cường quốc giầu mạnh nhất, mà là đế quốc gian ngoan nhất, nó được gọi là "lãnh đạo thế giới tự do", thật ra Mỹ "KHỐNG TRỊ THẾ GIỚI TỰ DO".

Sau sự sụp đổ của Sô Viết, Mỹ trở thành nước mạnh nhất về tất cả mọi lãnh vực, và nó trở thành đế quốc toàn cầu như chúng ta đã thấy đang thấy!

Nhà nước Mỹ hành xử ngang ngược, hống hách, bất chấp luật lệ, dù là luật lệ quốc gia, hiến pháp quốc gia hay công pháp quốc tế..bất chấp dân quyền, nhân quyền, nhân đạo, nó đã và đang giết người hàng loạt, bất chấp là kẻ cầm súng hay thường dân trẻ em vô tội...

Song hành với nó là Do Thái, cũng muốn hành xử đế quốc, nhưng đế quốc ngồi trên lưng Mỹ! như con Lừa đội lốt Hổ! Do thái dùng những trò tống tiền rình mò đã khống trị nền chính trị kinh tế Mỹ, đặc biệt từ sau khi J.F. Kennedy bị ám sát vì dám vạch mặt cưỡng lại nhóm tập đoàn đại bản Do Thái! (1)

Tính ngang ngược hống hách, khi bị thách thức đúng mức, nó trở thành trẻ con ăn vạ, và điều này được chính nhà nước Mỹ và người Mỹ minh chứng qua sự kiện Snowden.

Mỹ và họ hàng Âu Châu nhà nó "thành công" 90% toại ý trong việc ăn hiếp Wikileaks và Julian Assange, Bradley Manning... Đến khi bị gặp Snowden, Glenn Greenwald thì mọi chuyện đã khác......

Obama họp báo chê bai Putin là có dáng điệu "uể oải lừng khừng". Obama "dỗi" không thèm dự hội nghị! Quốc hội dân chúng Mỹ đòi tẩy chay thế vận mùa Đông tại Nga v.v.... chỉ vì không ăn hiếp được Snowden!!!

Nước Mỹ hôm nay giống như một đứa trẻ nhà giầu đươc nuông chiều quen thói, vẩn thường được chiều theo ý, quen bắt nạt những trẻ em yếu đuối hơn nó, và được như ý, Nay bỗng nhiên bị hẫng chân! Bị một đứa "trẻ Snowden" không sợ hãi tát tai lại, rồi còn bị nhóm người  "nghèo" hàng xóm nhưng đã hết sợ "nhà Mỹ" và đám họ hàng  Âu Châu nhà Mỹ đứng ra đối nghịch thẳng mặt , bênh vực "thằng bé Snowden" không e ngại, như Nga, Bolivia, Vênzuella, Ecuador v.v  Thế là thằng "trẻ con Mỹ" lăn đùng ra ăn vạ, gào thết, và hăm dọa đủ thứ người, kể cả người trong nhà nó dám hiểu biết đứng ra can ngăn nói lời phải trái với nó!!!

Đấy nước Mỹ và người Mỹ hôm nay đang hành xử như thế, Và hệ quả  Mỹ sẽ phải gánh vác chính là  tự hủy.  Và điều này đang xảy ra. Mỹ tự giết tinh thần tự do, tự trị của chính họ, Giết chết nền kinh tế sáng tạo tự do của chính Mỹ...Và đối kháng đã nẩy mầm và đang lớn mạnh dần.

Thời gian không dừng lại với ai hết!

...................................
More Evidence Mossad Killed
JFK Over Israeli Nukes
The Missing Link In The JFK Assassination Conspiracy
From John
9-28-3

(Note - The second item below is a letter from JFK to Israeli Prime Minister Eshkol which makes it crystal clear JFK did NOT want the Jewish state to develop nuclear weapons and that he was demanding regular US inspections of the Dimona Nuclear facility...which, as we now know, was/is used to develop Israel's enormous inventory of atomic and thermonuclear weapons. The US Air Force white paper regarding past and ongoing Israeli thermonuclear blackmail of the US is a stunning look at how Zionism has exerted such staggering domination over the US for decades. -ed)     After reading: "New JFK Assassination Theory" from WND, it is obvious that it is just more dis-information diverting attention away from the more than likely perpetrators, the Mossad. It's only fair to remind or inform your readers of the theory posed by Michael Collins Piper in 'Final Judgment'. His theory makes more sense than anything.     Final Judgement Reviewed by Mark Braver   There seems to be a lot of misperception of what Final Judgment does and does not say about the JFK assassination. The book does not say that "the Jews killed JFK." That's horse manure.   What the book does say is that: When New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison charged businessman Clay Shaw with participation in the JFK assassination conspiracy Garrison stumbled upon the Israeli Mossad connection to the murder of President Kennedy. Shaw served on the board of a shadowy corporation known as Permindex. A primary shareholder in Permindex was the Banque De Credit International of Geneva, founded by Tibor Rosenbaum, an arms procurer and financier for the Mossad.   What's more, the Mossad-sponsored Swiss bank was the chief "money laundry" for Meyer Lansky, the head of the international crime syndicate and an Israeli loyalist whose operations meshed closely on many fronts with the American CIA.   The chairman of Permindex was Louis M. Bloomfield of Montreal, a key figure in the Israeli lobby and an operative of the Bronfman family of Canada, long-time Lansky associates and among Israel's primary international patrons.   In the pages of "Final Judgment" the Israeli connection to the JFK assassination is explored in frightening--and fully documented--detail. For example, did you know:   * That JFK was engaged in a bitter secret conflict with Israel over U.S. East policy and that Israel's prime minister resigned in disgust, saying JFK's stance threatened Israel's very survival?   * That JFK's successor, Lyndon Johnson, immediately reversed America's policy toward Israel?   * That the top Mafia figures often alleged to be behind the JFK assassination were only front men for Meyer Lansky?   * That the CIA's liaison to the Mossad, James Angleton, was a prime mover behind the cover-up of the JFK assassination?   Why didn't Oliver Stone, in his famous movie "JFK" not mention any of this? It turns out the chief financial backer of Stone's film was longtime Mossad figure, Arnon Milchan, Israel's biggest arms dealer.   The very fact that the Israeli lobby has gone through such great lengths to try to smear Michael Collins Piper and to try to discredit Final Judgment gives the book great credibility. If the book was really so silly or so unconvincing, it doesn't seem likely that groups such as the Anti-Defamation League would go out of their way to try to suppress the book as they have.   The fact is that Piper demonstrates that Israel did indeed have a very strong motive to want to get JFK out of the way and that numerous people who have been linked in other writings to the JFK conspiracy were (as Piper documents) also in the sphere of influence of Israel's Mossad. Not only Clay Shaw in New Orleans, but also James Angleton at the CIA, who was Israel's strongest advocate at the CIA and also the CIA's liaison to the Mossad. The Israeli connection is indeed "the missing link in the JFK assassination conspiracy."   The "Reader from Chicago" who wrote the review of Final Judgment posted here is really off the beam and I suspect he (or she) is deliberately distorting what Piper's book does say in order to try to discourage people from reading it.   The fact is that Piper's book documents (quite clearly, in my estimation) not only the means, opportunity and the motive for Israeli Mossad involvement in the assassination (working in conjunction with the CIA), but it is also quite fascinating and very interesting read. "Boring" is the last word I'd use to describe the book, and it is certainly not "poorly written."   What's more, the book is not--I repeat--not "anti-Semitic" and the book has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the subject of the Holocaust. In fact, anybody familiar with any of the standard writings on the JFK assassination will recognize the names of some of the key players in the scenario Piper documents: Clay Shaw, David Ferrie, Guy Banister and James J. Angleton of the CIA--and none of them were Jewish. So where this reviewer gets off saying that Piper finds "a Jew under every rock" is beyond me. I have read literally hundreds of books and magazine articles and other material on the JFK assassination and not in a single one of them--with the exception of Final Judgment--did I ever learn that President John F. Kennedy was trying to stop Israel from building the nuclear bomb and that this literally touched off a "secret war" behind the scenes between JFK and Israel's prime minister, David Ben-Gurion, who resigned (among other reasons) in disgust over JFK's policies with Israel. In fact, Israeli historian Avner Cohen in his book, Israel and the Bomb, documents this quite thoroughly.   And in Final Judgment Piper also outlines some interesting Israeli connections by people who have been linked to the JFK assassination and cover-up, including Clay Shaw of New Orleans. Even Israeli journalist Barry Chamish has written in an Internet review of Final Judgment that he finds Piper's Israeli connection (via Shaw and Permindex) quite convincing.   There was a controversy in the Chicago area following an attempt by the Anti-Defamation League (an Israeli lobby organization) and people associated with the ADL to prevent Final Judgment from being placed in the Schaumburg Township District Library. Chances are the Reader from Chicago is probably an ADL representative! --This text refers to the Unknown Binding edition.   __________     JFK's Concern Over Israel's Nuclear Bomb Program   JFK's Letter To Israeli PM Eshkol July 5, 1963   Dear Mr. Prime Minister (Eshkol),   It gives me great personal pleasure to extend congratulations as you assume your responsibilities as Prime Minister of Israel. You have our friendship and best wishes in your new tasks. It is on one of these that I am writing you at this time.   You are aware, I am sure, of the exchange which I had with Prime Minister Ben-Gurion concerning American visits (ie: inspections -ed) to Israel's nuclear facility at Dimona. Most recently, the Prime Minister wrote to me on May 27. His words reflected a most intense personal consideration of a problem that I know is not easy for your Government, as it is not for mine. We welcomed the former Prime Minister's strong reaffirmation that Dimona will be devoted exclusively to peaceful purposes and the reaffirmation also of Israel's willingness to permit periodic visits (ie: inspections -ed) to Dimona.   I regret having to add to your burdens so soon after your assumption of office, but I feel the crucial importance of this problem necessitates my taking up with you at this early date certain further considerations, arising out of Mr. Ben-Gurion's May 27 letter, as to the nature and scheduling of such visits.   I am sure you will agree that these visits should be as nearly as possible in accord with international standards, thereby resolving all doubts as to the peaceful intent of the Dimona project. As I wrote Mr. Ben-Gurion, this Government's commitment to and support of Israel could be seriously jeopardized if it should be thought that we were unable to obtain reliable information on a subject as vital to the peace as the question of Israel's effort in the nuclear field.   Therefore, I asked our scientists to review the alternative schedules of visits we and you had proposed. If Israel's purposes are to be clear beyond reasonable doubt, I believe that the schedule which would best serve our common purposes would be a visit early this summer, another visit in June 1964, and thereafter at intervals of six months. I am sure that such a schedule should not cause you any more difficulty than that which Mr. Ben-Gurion proposed in his May 27 letter. It would be essential, and I understand that Mr. Ben-Gurion's letter was in accord with this, that our scientist have access to all areas of the Dimona site and to any related part of the complex, such as fuel fabrication facilities or plutonium separation plant, and that sufficient time to be allotted for a thorough examination.   Knowing that you fully appreciate the truly vital significance of this matter to the future well-being of Israel, to the United States, and internationally, I am sure our carefully considered request will have your most sympathetic attention.   Sincerely, John F. Kennedy   http://www.jfkmontreal.com/toc.htm     Here is the US Air Force paper on Israel's nuclear blackmail of the United States and its influence on US foreign policy. One can draw additional conclusions about how such blackmail might have factored into the trillion plus US dollars that have benefited Israel since JFK's murder.     Israel's 'Use' Of Nuclear Weapons Against Us Bush Must Say 'No' To Israeli Nuclear Blackmail - LaRouche

An Interview with Mark Lane Dr. Grover B. Proctor, Jr. November 14, 1991

Grover Proctor's review of Mark Lane's book Plausible Denial is also published in these pages. Proctor: Presumably when you undertook to become "a counsel for Lee Oswald" in 1963-64, and later when you wrote Rush to Judgment, you didn't begin with the idea that the CIA had killed President Kennedy. When did you seriously begin to question, to quote your book jacket, "Was the CIA involved in the assassination of JFK?" LANE: The first book I wrote, as you know, didn't deal with who did it. It took the Warren Commission Report and compared each of the essential conclusions of the Warren Commission to the evidence which the Warren Commision said it relied upon, and demonstrated that the evidence did not support the conclusions. In addition to that, I did my own interviews, as you know, and showed that [they] even further challenged the Warren Commission conclusions, as did some of the documents. All I was trying to do with Rush to Judgment was, not show who killed the President, but in essence who did not. I was trying to demonstrate that the Warren Commission report, which was an obstacle to going forward for a full investigation, was a fraudulent document. That's all I dealt with.       I had no idea who killed the president then. I never had an idea at that time. I never speculated for a moment, either when I wrote or when I thought about it or when I talked about it. I never knew; that's all. I did know, of course, that there were powerful forces involved in covering up the facts. I didn't know then, but I know now, that the Central Intelligence Agency reviewed my book Rush to Judgment before I got a copy of it, and what they said about it, and that they thought it was dangerous and had to be stopped. I didn't know that then but I was feeling the effects of the influence of the intelligence organizations through the news media, although I never specifically was able to demonstrate at that point that it was in fact the intelligence organizations which were responsible for what was taking place.       I suppose [it was] when I first met Marita Lorenz in the mid-70s. I had known about her but I had never met her and never talked to her. I had been living in New York, but I wasn't living in New York at that time. There was a story in the New York Post which said that Frank Sturgis had been arrested because, according to her, he had threatened to kill her and her daughter. It told what her address was. I found her and I interviewed her. Everything she told me, which is in Plausible Denial, everything she has said to the jury in her deposition, everything she has said since then in the videotaped interview, has always been consistent. And so in the mid-70s, I had her position, which was that the CIA had killed President Kennedy, that she was part of the team, and she knew exactly what she was talking about. I had her statement, but there was no forum, no place to publish it.       Thereafter, when I tried the [Liberty Lobby] case, I knew I was going to call her as a witness if I could find her. That was many years later, and I was able to. I started looking around at other evidence, and then I uncovered this additional evidence, which is the heart of the Mexico City scenario where you see that Earl Warren was briefed. I found that really interesting and corroborative evidence because that alone demonstrates the CIA involvement in the assassination of President Kennedy, and how Warren was manipulated, and how the CIA was setting up Oswald in September 1963 for a crime which was not going to take place for two months. It wasn't a cover-up anymore, it was planning. That alone demonstrated CIA involvement, as did Marita Lorenz' testimony alone demonstrate CIA involvement. But taken together these two separate bodies of evidence, I think, prove conclusively what took place.       So, taking the long way of answering your question, it was in the mid-70s after talking with Maritz Lorenz that I began to believe that maybe the CIA did it. Proctor: When I was investigating the Raleigh call, I interviewed Victor Marchetti. He told me that Oswald was acting in a way consistent with his believing that he was working with some intelligence agency. Does this conform to your findings? LANE: I believe that's true. I believe that Oswald thought he was working for the FBI. I don't know if he was, but of course Waggoner Carr, who was the Attorney General of Texas, told Henry Wade (the Dallas District Attorney) and the Warren Commission that Oswald was working for the FBI and the number assigned to him was 172 or 179. But I think there's no question that Oswald felt he was involved with the FBI. And he may have been, or it may have been CIA operatives saying they were FBI. And they may have fooled him into thinking he was working for the FBI. I think he did have an FBI connection, however, and I think that that was well thought out, because that throws [FBI Chief J. Edgar] Hoover into inaction. Here was a man whose slogan was "Don't embarrass the Bureau," and a missing box of paper clips to him was an embarrassment to the Bureau. And now his employee killed the President -- very embarrassing. And of course they knew that. So I think it was determined by the CIA "We will have someone who will have an FBI connection. That will prevent Hoover from ever looking into this." As it certainly did. Proctor: You dismiss as untrue Canfield and Weberman's identification of two of the so-called Dealey Plaza "tramps" as E. Howard Hunt and Frank Sturgis. Yet, you claim evidence that Hunt and Sturgis were in Dallas that day. LANE: If one says that that is E. Howard Hunt, it's based not upon testimony by anyone who says he's there, but it's based upon just examination of the picture -- because it looks like him. I took a picture of E. Howard Hunt in 1963 and compared it with that man, and that man was old enough to be Hunt's father. I confronted the people who fingered Hunt as that guy with that statement and they said, "Well, if he had a lot of makeup on, it would totally disguise his look. It could be Hunt." And I said, "Well, yeah, but you say it looks like him. If it doesn't look like him, we don't have anything. And now you're saying you have a reason why it doesn't look like him."       Furthermore, you have to know Hunt. Hunt was certainly an activist, [but] all of these guys like Hunt and Liddy tend to portray themselves as much more active and macho than they really are in life. Hunt was a propagandist. Hunt was the paymaster for illegal operations by the CIA on the east coast. Hunt was not a gunman. Hunt didn't go behind wooden fences and shoot people. That wasn't his role ever. And so, it doesn't look like him, he [the tramp] was too old, and it wasn't the role he [Hunt] was involved in -- he was the paymaster of this operation.       We had a lot of evidence. David Belin, who became general counsel and staff director of the Rockefeller Commission, he knew what the evidence was. He is no dummy. He is, in my view, a disreputable person who was trying to deceive the American people, but he's not dumb. He knew. He never called me to testify, or dozens of other people who had information. He called the people with the so-called "tramp photos" to come forward and speak all day long before the Rockefeller Commission, so that he could then say, "They're wrong. It's not Hunt." In other words, this was a photograph which was utilized by the government, and once they could say their analysts proved that Hunt is not in that picture, then the press ran the story, "Hunt Absolved." And then when you try to say Hunt was involved, they say, "Oh no, he's not in the picture." You then say, "Oh no no no, I don't say he was in the picture, but he was involved." "No, no. He's been absolved." Proctor: It's the Billy Lovelady syndrome. LANE: Exactly. Proctor: You take Oliver Stone to task in your book for alterations in the screenplay of his film JFK which you admitted you had not seen. Do you know any more now, and do you stand by your criticisms? LANE: I still haven't seen it. I only know what the alterations are from his statements. I have the first screenplay. It was a fairly strong screenplay. I know that; I've read that. And then I've read his statements -- and I'm not talking about quotes attributed to him, I'm talking about an article that he wrote -- saying that [former New Orleans district attorney, now Federal judge Jim] Garrison is more arrogant than Attila the Hun, and he's a flawed person, and "I relied not upon Garrison but I relied upon Mark Lane, or the work he has done." Well, I know that's not true. I did meet with him, but when he said he had the right to fictionalize anything I wrote, I said "No, this is American history. Don't fictionalize it. It's a very dramatic story. Just tell the truth." Because I would not agree that he could fictionalize it, we didn't make a deal. Now he is saying he relied upon my work. And in his own articles he says that he is using the Rashomon approach, telling the story from various different viewpoints. Well, before it was told from one viewpoint, and that one viewpoint was a clear presentation that there had been a conspiracy to kill the president and indicating the CIA had been involved. It was Garrison's story; that's what Garrison said at the time in the Shaw case. Yet he says it's now Rashomon. Now I haven't seen it, and I don't think one should criticize it, and I'm not. All I'm saying is by his own admission he has moved from that original position, and I was sorry to see that. But let's wait and see the film.

Dr. Grover B. Proctor, Jr. is a historian and former university Dean who is widely acknowledged as an expert on the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. He has published numerous articles, lectured extensively, and has frequently been consulted by print and broadcast media.      While most of his work comprises analysis and interpretation of the assassination research phenomenon, he broke new ground in the investigation in the early 1980's with his work on Lee Harvey Oswald's alleged telephone call from the Dallas jail to a former military counterintelligence agent in Raleigh, N.C.

National Journal, for the sake of truth and knowledge 

Does Mossad destroy the Kennedy family?

John F. Kennedy sr. committed himself to two mortal sins against Jewry. He intended to smash their world-control-base in the USA by bringing the Federal Reserve Bank (FED) back under government control. Moreover, he denied Israel America's Nuclear-Weapon-Program. This would have meant to World-Jewry the loss of their power base and it finally resulted in bringing death over himself and his family. Kennedy's successor, Lyndon B. Johnson, did the opposite and provided Israel with the atomic program shortly after he took over office. Ever since, Israel has been in a position to threaten the entire world with weapons of mass destruction. After the death of JFK sr. all plans for making the FED a governmental institution were dropped and the idea has never since been resurrected.

The Jewish leaders consider any threat against Jewish power as a threat to their physical existence and is taken deadly seriously. The FED is a private Jewish enterprise that prints the American currency. The printed product is then lent by the higher echelon of Jewry with interest to the US-government. It means that every American is paying interest, without having borrowed money, on the wages he earns through his hard work in form of taxes etc. On the other hand, without atomic weapons the Jewish motherland (as a safe heaven for all Jews) would not be invincible and the Chosen would not be free to confiscate the lands of other peoples and commit genocide under the comfortable umbrella of their immense nuclear arsenal of weaponry.

Jews in power interpret any measures against them that could reduce their influence on world politics as a denial of their physical existence. Those who deny the total power of these people are subsequently marked as Amalek: Not only Amalekites must, according to biblical laws, be destroyed but also their descendants: "Talmudic ruling: 'it is forbidden to multiply the seed of Amalek' ... Amalekites, meaning that one is permitted to murder (sic) them until their remembrance is blotted out from under heaven." (Israel Shahak, Jewish History, Jewish Religion, Pluto Press, London 1994, p. 77, 84) Jahweh's order to blot out the Amelekites is also expressed in the Bible: "Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy  everything that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys." (1 Samuel 15:3)

John F. Kennedy sr. was assassinated on November 22, 1963 in Dallas/Texas in a Mossad organized operation. (Mark Lane, Plausible Denial, USA 1994 and Michael Collins Piper, Best Witness) Only five years later, his brother Robert, who had a very good chance of following JFK's presidency, was murdered too. In 1969 an assassination attempt against Edward Kennedy (JFK's older brother) failed but Edward's mistress died in this "car accident". Edward Kennedy subsequently announced that he would not run for president. David Kennedy (Robert Kennedy's son) died of an overdose of drugs whilst his second son suffered a lethal accident on the ski run in Aspen.

And now John F. Kennedy jr. has died in a plane crash together with his wife and his sister in law. Although he was at risk for being a descendant of an Amelikite, he further provoked his fate by announcing the possibility of running for president sometime in the future. Later he committed a greater political error of judgement when he became interested in the murder of the slain Israeli Prime-Minister Ytzak Rabin. He was fascinated because the Rabin assassination showed strong parallels with the one of his own father. He was obviously planning to make his ideas public that his father and Ytzak Rabin were both murdered.

Bild am Sonntag	August 1, 1999	Page 6, 7
(Germany's largest Sunday paper - excerpts)
Dead Kennedy-Son: Murder Theories Flourish Israeli Author: Explosive device went off on board of Piper aircraft By PETER MICHALSKI ... Was it really a Pilot's error? Wild murder theories flourish after the lethal accident of JFK jr. as it happened after the fatal accident of Princess Diana. The French magazine "France Dimanche" took the lead and announced on front page: "John F Kennedy jr. was murdered!". The magazine refers to a pilot of New Jersey who heard a weird noise, caused by Kennedy's Piper during take off. This witness also wondered that an alleged co-pilot did eventually refuse to go on this flight, claiming he felt sick ... However, out of the many murder theories there is one standing out: The Israeli Journalist and book author Barry Chamish (44) is convinced that the Kennedy aircraft was blown up shortly before landing. The writer states that he received an e-mail message with excerpts of a "FBI preliminary investigation report" that contained sensational claims: Traces of an explosive device were found in the cargo section of the aircraft and laboratory tests concluded that these traces are "the typical type of explosives used by certain foreign intelligence services". Satellite exposures of the National Reconnaissance Office (a Pentagon System of Sky-Spies) are showing a flash coming out of the aircraft, which would indicate an explosion. Especially tragic, item 15: "Examinations of the bodies have established that Carolyn Besette-Kennedy carried a 3 months fetus, a boy." Sure, every murder version needs a motive. Who could have had an interest to murder John F. Kennedy jr.? Barry Chamish formulates it cautiously: "The most probable origin of the explosive device is a Middle Eastern state." He does not name the country by its name. But between the lines it is clear: He means Israel. His theory: Kennedy jr. was far to interested in the political assassination of the Israeli Prime Minister Rabin (1995), because his fathers murder which was similar to that of Rabin. Last Wednesday Kennedy jr. had arranged to meet the deputy Director of the Israeli intelligence service Mossad, Amiram Levine, for lunch at the "Oak-Room"-Restaurant of the New York "Plaza". The subject was: The Rabin case. Chamish: "Kennedy did not make a secret of his opinion that there were many questions open in the Rabin case." In his magazine "George" he asked in March 1997: "Who was behind the Rabin murder?" He was fascinated by the possibility that not the extremist Ygal Amir, but a body guard of Rabin could have fired the lethal shots. The suspected body guard has since committed suicide.

Obama: Putin is slouchin’

By Emily Heil, Published: August 9 at 3:43 pmE-mail the writer

During Friday’s news conference, President Obama described Russian President Vladmir Putin as having a “slouch…looking like that bored schoolboy in the back of the classroom.”
Perhaps the president was trying to infer something about Putin’s intentions or public posturing based on his — well, actual posture. Something about Putin seems to invite scrutiny of his physiology by U.S. presidents trying to divine his inner workings (remember how former President George W. Bush looked into his eyes and saw his tender soul?).
But we couldn’t find much photographic evidence of Putin slouching. In fact, it looks like his carriage is pretty upstanding. See here:

(Dmitry Astakhov / AFP/Getty Images)