Cách đây hơn 10 năm, năm 2002, học giả sử học Anh quốc Gavin Menzies, một cựu hạm trưởng biệt đội tầu ngầm của hải quân hoàng gia Anh, đã làm chấn động giới khoa bảng hàn lâm sử học với hai quyển sách của ông.
Quyền thứ nhất tựa đề "1421, năm Người Trung Quốc Khám phá Châu Mỹ" (1421 The Year China Discovered America), đã được làm thành phim tài liệu do đài PBS của Mỹ trình chiếu. Quyển thứ hai "1434 năm Một Hạm Đội Hùng Vĩ Trung Quốc đến Ý và Phát Khởi thời Phục Hưng âu Châu (1434: The Year a Magnificent Chinese Fleet Sailed to Italy and Ignited the Renaissance)
Nội dung hai quyển này gây chấn động vì nó không chỉ lật đổ toàn bộ những "sự kiện sử học" trong sách vở chính qui" về huyền thoại "tam vĩ" của Tây âu: 3 nhân vật đầu tiên được xem là làm thay đổi toàn bộ bản đồ thế giới.
1- Christopher Columbus, người được "sử ghi nhận" cho đến nay khám phá Mỹ châu 12-10-1492
2- Captain Cook, khám phá Úc Châu 19-04-1770
3- Ferdinand Magellan. nhà hải hành vòng quanh thế giới đầu tiên 1519-1522
Mà còn phá vỡ luôn niềm tự hào thế kỷ 15 "Âu Châu Phục Hưng" (Renaissance) của họ!
Ông Gavin Menzies đã chứng minh trong hai quyển sách của ông rằng chính Đô Đốc Trịnh Hòa của nhà Minh Trung Quốc mới là người đầu tiên khám phá Mỹ châu và Úc Châu, và là người hải hành vòng thế giới đầu tiên từ thế kỷ 15 (1421). Do tình cờ Gavin Menzies tìm được một bản đồ cũ tiếng Hoa của Trịnh Hòa ghi chép vùng Châu mỹ. Và chính tấm bản đồ này Christopher Columbus đã dùng để cho cuộc hải hành của ông ta.
Cũng theo Gavin Menzies, người da đỏ ở Mỹ hiện nay là một phần của con cháu của người gốc Á đã đến Mỹ châu cách đây 40 ngàn năm. Và người Hoa đã đến Úc châu trong thời Trịnh Hòa trước người Âu- nhưng do biến động thay đổi chính sách tại mẫu quốc, họ bị cắt liên lạc và tan rã và chết dần mòn nơi các bộ lạc thổ dân.
Đô Đốc Trịnh Hòa, tên thật là Ma Hòa là một hoạn quan gốc người Hồi giáo Ba Tư. Ông là chắt 3 đời của Sayyid Ajjal Shams al-Din Omar, vị tổng đốc đầu tiên của Thành Cát Tư Hãn người Ba Tư vùng Uzbekistan, được bổ nhậm cai trị vùng Vân Nam đất Tầu. Khi nhà Nguyên suy yếu bị nhà Minh của Chu Nguyên Chương đánh bật. Gia đình Ma Hòa thuộc nhóm Hồi giáo quân Mông Cổ trong vùng đối kháng nhà Minh trong thời kỳ đầu của Minh triều. Năm Ma Hòa 11 tuồi trong trận xung đột biên giới giữa quân Hồi giáo Mông và nhà Minh, Ma Hòa bị bắt và bị thiến làm thái giám gia nhân cho hoàng tử Chu Lệ nhà Minh, Chu Lệ sau này là Chu Thành Tổ Vĩnh Lạc (1402-1424). Trong thời kỳ này Ma Hòa nhờ theo sát thái tử Chu Lệ đánh trận có công nên được tin dùng, đặc biệt là trong trận đánh đảo chính Kiến Văn Hoàng đế tại Bắc Kinh (1402) nên khi Chu Lệ lên ngôi hoàng đế Ma Hòa được cải tên thành Trịnh Hòa và được thăng chức Đại Tổng Quản chỉ huy nội cung và sau phong Đô Đốc Thủy Sư đi xứ ngoại giao các nơi.. Nhờ vậy Trịnh Hòa được Chu Thành Tổ cho mở các cuộc viễn dương cực lớn vì lúc đó Nhà Minh là triều đại có hạm đội thủy quân lớn nhất thế giới thời bấy giờ.
(tượng Trịnh Hòa tại Mã Lai)
Tất cả cuộc viễn dương của Trịnh Hòa đều tiến hành trong thời Minh Thành Tổ. Khi Thành Tổ bị con trai Hồng Hi giết đoạt ngôi, Hồng Hi đã ra lệnh hủy bỏ toàn bộ các cuộc viễn dương và ra lệnh đốt hết tất cả những văn bản ghi chú bản đồ của Trịnh Hòa. Chính - vì lý do này quyển sách của Gavin Menzies gây tranh luận vì không kết nối được nhiều "di tích chứng sử" hải hành của Trịnh Hòa ngoài tấm bản đồ tình cờ tìm được.
Dĩ nhiên giới sữ gia Tây Âu và quần chúng âu Mỹ không dễ gì thừa nhận khám phá mới này của Gavin Menzies. Đây không chỉ đơn thuần là vấn đề khoa học sử chứng, mà nó vẫn luôn là vấn đề chính trị quyền lực và tự ái "giống nòi". Ngay như sự kiện gần cận với đời sống tất cả mọi người là việc "cha đẻ của máy phát điện" nguồn ánh sáng và năng lượng toàn bộ nhân loại đang dùng hôm nay, vẫn thường gian lận cố tình cho là Thomas Edison, Tại\Mỹ trước đây vẫn có lệ hàng năm tắt điện 1 phút để nhớ công"Thomas Edison", mặc dù giới Tây âu và Mỹ biết rõ chính Nicolas Telsla (1856-1943) mới là cha đẻ cùa máy phát điện AC và nhiều phát minh khác mà thế giới dùng hôm nay với nhiều công trình cụ thể từ năm 1880-1920, cũng như cuộc đấu đá cạnh tranh nổi tiếng giữa máy phát điện hai chiều AC của Telsla và mày điện 1 chiều DC của Edison.(Current War)..Mãi đến gần cuối thế kỷ 20 (1980) Telsla mới được "chính thức công nhận" rộng rãi, báo chí phim ảnh nói về Telsla, và người ta mới biết đến tên Nicolas Telsla. Thông lệ tắt điện tui73ng nhớ Edison biến mất!!!Nhưng cho đến ngay hôm nay 2013- đại đa số dân chúng khắp nơi trên thế giới, vẫn không biết là họ đang hưởng thụ tiện nghi từ thành quả máy phát điện, thủy điện của Nicolas Telsla, họ vẫn chỉ nhớ cái tên Thomas Edison khi nói về điện dân dụng vì cái tên này đã được báo chí sách vở đài báo chính qui chuyện trò trao đổi thổi phồng thành huyền thoại qua bao nhiêu năm rồi..
Thế mới biết Ai KIỂM SOÁT ĐƯỢC QUÁ KHỨ sẽ KIỂM SOÁT ĐƯỢC TƯƠNG LAI, và Ai KHỐNG TRỊ ĐƯỢC HIỆN TẠI sẽ KHỐNG TRỊ ĐƯỢC QUÁ KHỨ...
Nhà văn Mỹ Mark Twain, cũng là bạn thân của Telsla lúc sinh thời, từng nhận định chính xác: "Thật là dễ dàng làm cho người ta tin một điều dối trá, và thật là quá khó khăn để tháo gỡ điều dối trá đó (How easy it is to make people believe a lie, and how hard it is to undo that work again!)
Câu chuyện của Đô Đốc Thủy Sư Trịnh Hòa sẽ càng gặp khó khăn hơn nữa khi cả thế giới, sách vở "sử liệu", phim ảnh chính qui, chính sử đã gắn chặt tên của Columbus, Cook, Magellan đầy dẫy trong văn khố- được lập đi lập lại hàng mấy trăm năm nay nơi trường học với bao thế hệ- và nhất là cả một áp lực chính trị tự hào "văn minh thị dân" Đông Tây đang tái diễn mà Trung Quốc cũng như Iran đang bị dùng làm cái bia tác xạ của bàn cờ toàn cầu hôm nay... đâu dễ gì tháo gỡ "kiến thức cũ",.Cũng còn may mắ một điều "nho nhỏ" là khám phá này là do một cụu sĩ quan hải quân Anh Quốc nên đã "được" đối xử tử tế, báo chí Âu Mỹ đăng tải khá rộng rãi, rồi ra sách, làm phim và được trình chiếu trên đài chính qui như PBS để tranh luận và tham khảo. Chứ nếu là của một giáo sư người "Tầu lục địa" thì chắc chắn sẽ chẳng được PBS làm phim để thảo luận, và báo chí đăng tải rộngr rãi tranh luận, mà đã bị tấn công dập vùi mỉa mai đủ cách!
Người viết có cảm giác rằng đám "nho nhỏ" Âu Mỹ "khó chịu" với khám phá của Gavin Menzies vẫn không bằng thái độ "hằn học" của các con giời ái quốc tổ cò" Việt Nam đang phùng mang chống Tầu"...và chống tất cả cái gì với họ là "của Tầu"....
Sử gia William Blum quả sâu sắc, khi viết về Chủ nghĩa quốc gia dân tộc, chủ nghĩa ái quốc trong bài "Vài suy nghĩ về " Lòng yêu nước " | Chủ Quyền Cá Nhân") đã cho thấy chủ nghĩa này nó nguy hiểm hơn cả tôn giáo, vì, nó không chỉ có khả năng gói trọn bộ óc con người vào niềm tin vô chứng, sẵn sàng giết người một cách thản nhiên hãnh diện, mà nó còn có sức mạnh khiến cho "công dân yêu nước" có khả năng chối bỏ ngay cả thực tại!
Riêng cá nhân tôi, người viết bản tin này, đã không chỉ đặt dấu hỏi vào tất cả những thứ gọi là chính quí, chính thống, chính sử mà còn đã và đang chứng minh những dối trá nhồi nhét bịa đặt của cả những học thuyết chính qui về chính trị, kinh tế, tài chính nữa! Đơn giản, hiện trạng của thế giới trong 50 năm qua và ngay hiện tại đã cho thấy những học thuyết định đề kinh tế chính trị hoàn toàn chẳng ăn nhập gì với hiện trạng!
Mảng lịch sử có Trịnh Hòa này, chúng ta cứ phải đặt dấu hỏi để chờ thêm chứng cớ.. Trong khi chờ đợi, nhờ nỗ lực Menzies dù chưa thành công minh chứng giả thuyết của ông được chặt chẽ với đầy đủ chứng cớ, nó cũng cho chúng ta một bằng chứng rõ ràng mà những học giả đối kháng phải thừa nhận, đó là Columbus không phải là người âu châu đầu tiên đến Mỹ châu, vì tấm bản đồ mà Columbus dùng phải do một người đã đi đến vẽ trước! Nhưng chưa xác định được là ai. Đây là điểm tựa mà Menzies khởi công tìm câu trả lời. Như thế chúng ta cũng phải tháo gỡ cái dấu chấm trong tờ sách sử cũ về Columbus đi, thay vào một dấu hỏi lớn "Columbus dùng tấm bản đồ không phải của mình, nhưng không hề ghi chép lại là của ai người đã thực hiện trước cuộc hải hành để vẽ được ra bản hải trình này- để nhắc nhở sự bí ẩn chưa khai mở này với mọi người về huyền thoại chứng sử bị cố tình bỏ quên- Và nhất là tính thường trực của khoa học không chĩ là cần chính xác, mà chính là tính chất vấn không ngưng nghỉ khi có bất cứ một điểm ngờ vực nổi lên dù là nhỏ bé đến đâu.
NKPTC
====================
Chinese Map From 1418 Proves Zheng He Found America Before Columbus: Historian
By Zachary Stieber, Epoch Times | October 8, 2013
An ancient Chinese map found in a used bookstore helps prove that the Chinese Admiral Zheng He discovered America before Christopher Columbus, according to a historian.
British historian Gavin Menzies makes the claim in his newest book, “Who Discovered America?”
“The traditional story of Columbus discovering the New World is absolute fantasy, it’s fairy tales,” Menzies told the Daily Mail.
The map found in the bookstore is purportedly an 18th century copy of a 1418 map from He.
Menzies has multiple controversial theories, including that the first inhabitants of the Western hemisphere were Chinese sailors who crossed the Pacific Ocean 40,000 years ago.
Further, Menzies says that Columbus had He’s map when he sailed to America.
Menzies put forth the theories in a previous book but just recently discovered the map, which he says adds strength to his theories.
As part of his argument, he says that Chinese names of villages in Peru signal that the Chinese were there first.
The Chinese arrived at the Americas no later than 1421, 71 years before Columbus visited the islands of the Caribbean in 1492, he writes in the book. Zheng He visited the Outer Banks and North Carolina, among other places.
Menzies mentions in his introduction how he was called a fraud for his previous books because of purported lack of evidence behind his claims.
But the record has strengthened since then and “provides broad proof about China in the New World,” he writes.
“I bring along fellow travelers on my journeys in search of new evidence about the exploration of the Americas, and some of the travelers are skeptics themselves, ” he writes. “I welcome challenges and I share data with a network of readers and fellow explorers. We have been gathering a mountain of new data in these 10 years since publication of ’1421,’ so much material that it now time to published more evidence of the Chinese exploration of America.”
Part of the new data is the result of advances in genetics and DNA testing and analysis, he says.
However, some people say that Menzies and his information is not reliable.
Felipe Fernandez-Armesto, professor of history at the University of London, dismissed one of his earlier books, 1421: The Year China Discovered the World, as “the historical equivalent of stories about Elvis Presley in Tesco and close encounters with alien hamsters,” reported the Telegraph.
It's official: Admiral Zheng beat Cook to Australia
November 25 2002
By Peter Fray
By Peter Fray
History is littered with what-ifs and wild theories. Most are ignored, but one now being posed by a former British submarine commander could eventually rewrite the accepted history of Australia, America and half the world.
Gavin Menzies, a 65-year-old self-confessed "outsider", has sparked heated academic debate by claiming the Chinese beat Europeans to the New World by decades, if not centuries.
If true, his theories would recast the holy trinity of European naval explorers - Captain Cook, Christopher Columbus and Ferdinand Magellan - as followers in the great wake of 15th century China's Admiral Zheng He and his fleet of colossal, nine-masted teak junks.
Released earlier this month, Menzies' book, 1421, the Year China Discovered The World, is likely to have a worldwide print run of a million copies. It sits next to Simon Schama's latest on Amazon's best-selling list for history.
The TV rights have been sold in Britain. On London's Tube, Menzies' first publishing venture is being promoted as the book that's rewriting history.
In Australia's case, Menzies claims Zheng's vice-admirals, Hong Bao and Zhou Man, beat Cook by almost 350 years. The two men, both eunuchs (as was the custom for captains), arrived in Australia in 1422 - Hong on the west coast, Zhou on the east - and spent several months exploring, landing in several places.
Their ships were massive - 122 metres long by 27 metres wide - not that much smaller than a modern aircraft carrier and absolute giants compared with those used by Columbus about 70 years later. The captains navigated by the stars.
Each ship had up to 1000 sailors, who were supplied with fresh vegetables, meat and rice grown on factory ships that accompanied the fleet. Sex was provided by prostitutes who came equipped with sex aids and aphrodisiacs.
The Chinese were after treasure, mainly minerals. To assist exploration, Menzies says, they built small villages, complete with observation platforms for surveying, near Gympie in Queensland and Eden in New South Wales. They found lead, silver, semi-precious stones and, in the Northern Territory, uranium.
According to Menzies, some of their men formed lasting sexual partnerships with Aborigines, especially in Arnhem Land, where Zhou's ships stayed for several months.
"There's stacks of evidence that they were there," he argues. "Wrecks, plants found in Australia by the first Europeans which had come from China, carved stones, kangaroos in the Chinese emperor's zoo, Chinese jade, figurines and ceramics."
Menzies says their visits were recorded by local Aboriginal people in cave drawings found near Sydney and shipwrecks found off Warrnambool, Perth and Byron Bay.
"I think it's absolutely impossible to claim Columbus discovered America, Cook discovered Australia, and Magellan was the first to circumnavigate the world," he says. "You'd have to be a crank nowadays to believe that. They are fairytales. Anyone who objectively looked at the evidence can't say that."
But Menzies' evidence is mainly ancient maps, often hotly disputed charts prepared by 15th and 16th century European cartographers. He says they could only have been based on eyewitness reports of Zheng's journeys between 1421 and 1423, which he says predate those of other adventurers.
He even identifies the eyewitness, a young and well-connected Venetian called Niccolo da Conti, whose accounts of the Chinese voyages were published on his return to Venice. But Menzies concedes that his research has not uncovered a smoking gun or revealed any single piece of startling new evidence.
The problem is partly of China's own making. Not long after Zheng's fleet set sail, his great supporter, the Emperor Zhu Di, was overthrown by his son Zhu Gaozhi, who reversed his father's expansionist program and, on return of the fleet, ordered that no more voyages be undertaken. All relevant maps were destroyed. What Chinese settlements may have been left in Australia simply died out or were subsumed into Aboriginal society.
Faced with the lack of hard evidence from China, Menzies' theory, which has been developing since he saw a mediaeval map of the spheres in Venice 13 years ago, is based on a re-evaluation and reinter-pretation of existing information - a fact that has opened him up to academic criticism.
The head of the map collection in the British Library, Peter Barber, describes Menzies' theories as potentially dangerous, as they seek to rewrite history from outside the bounds of proper scrutiny and academic rigour. He draws a distinction between Menzies and academically trained populist historians, such as Simon Schama and David Starkey.
"These theories are not necessarily quite as harmless as people might think," he says.
"The consequences can be very grave. You get the big lie. I have met serious scholars who are incredulous of his theories and they can't be bothered to argue, which is a real shame."
Central to Menzies' theories about Australia is a master world map produced in 1542 by Jean Rotz, a French-born cartographer from the Dieppe school, who became map-maker to Henry VIII. The Rotz map, when adjusted for ice and the lack of longitude, accurately shows Australia as Greater Java, Menzies says.
But Barber describes the Rotz map as "generally discredited or, at the very least, hotly contested".
"Nowhere does Menzies give any indication that what he says is fact, is in fact controversial. In order to prove something, you need to come forward with the hard evidence."
Another map used by Menzies, drawn by Venetian Fra Mauro in 1459, even fails to accurately depict China, a strange occurrence if the Chinese were the source, Barber says.
Menzies' views came to light in March this year, when he gave a talk to London's Royal Geographical Society. As luck would have it, the topic sparked interest from Chinese satellite television station Phoenix, which in turn prompted American networks ABC and NBC to report on the theories - and get Chinese feedback. The talks ended up being seen by three million people in China.
"By an incredible bit of luck we got worldwide coverage. That resulted in a flood of information," Menzies says.
Soon after that, with the debate raging in Britain and China, his fledgling book on the subject jumped in size from 150 pages to more than 500 pages. He found a publisher and sold the rights for a reported �500,000 ($A1.35 million) to Transworld.
But the Royal Geographical Society remains at arm's length from Menzies, despite its obvious opportunity for bragging rights.
"The society does not endorse his views," spokesman Elliot Robertson says. "People are saying 'interesting theory, but where is your proof?' We'd like to see further information come forward, not just from him."
Establishment indifference to his theories will not stop Menzies - who soon plans to promote his take on Columbus to the Americans - but it nonetheless upsets him.
"It's just balls. It's absolute crap. The establishment has to protect their patch. Nobody who has given us a mauling has read the evidence, read the book."
But perhaps the most telling criticisms have come from the Chinese themselves. Admiral Zheng may be virtually unknown in the West, but in China he has been the subject of intense academic scrutiny for centuries.
According to a report in The Times newspaper earlier this month, Menzies' ideas were politely pooh-poohed by many leading researchers during his recent visit to Nanjing.
Professor Luo Zongzheng, from the Nanjing Museum, reportedly told Menzies: "So far, there are too many theories about Zheng He, but there are no relics, no boats or anything concrete. So the theories are not convincing."
Peter Fray is The Age Europe correspondent.
Does this map from 1418 prove historian's controversial claim that the New World was discovered by the CHINESE 70 years before Columbus?
- Gavin Menzies, a British historian, claims Chiense Admiral Zheng He set up colonies and sailed round South America before Columbus
- Menzies' new book, 'Who Discovered America?' also claims the Chinese have been sailing to the New World since 40,000 BC across the Pacific Ocean
- His theories are not widely accepted by academia and he has been labeled a 'pseudo-historian'
|
A copy of a 600-year-old map found in a second-hand book shop is the key to proving that the Chinese, not Christopher Columbus, were the first to discover the New World, a controversial British historian claims.
The document is purportedly an 18th century copy of a 1418 map charted by Chinese Admiral Zheng He, which appears to show the New World in some detail.
This purported evidence that a Chinese sailor mapped the Western Hemisphere more than seven decades before Columbus is just one of Earth-shattering claims that author Gavin Menzies makes in his new book ‘Who Discovered America?’ - out today, just in time for the Columbus Day holiday.
‘The traditional story of Columbus discovering the New World is absolute fantasy, it’s fairy tales,’ Mr Menzies told MailOnline.
Enlarge
Mr Menzies believes that this portion of the map depicts the Chinese mapping of North and South America in 1418 - showing major rivers.
Explorer: Chinese Admiral Zheng He is known to have sailed the to Europe and Africa with a massive fleet of ships. Historian Gavin Menzies says he also reached the New World
He also writes that DNA markers prove American Indians and other natives are the descendants of several waves of Asian settlers.
Furthermore, he says a majestic fleet of Chinese ships, commanded by Zheng He, sailed around the continent of South America - 100 years before Ferdinand Megellan supposedly became the first the undertake the task.
Columbus features heavily in the book - insofar as Menzies has devoted the last 20 years to finding and laying out evidence that Columbus not only didn’t discover America - he was 40 millenia late.
Mr Menzies believes that Columbus actually had a map of the world that was plotted by the Chinese Admiral Zheng He, who created the map when he sailed to the New World in 1421, more than seven decades before Columbus.
Mr Menzies believes that this portion of the map depicts the Chinese mapping of North and South America in 1418 - showing major rivers.
His book includes what Menzies says is a copy of that map. discovered by Beijing attorney Liu Gang in a second-hand bookshop that he says proves his theory.
The document, he says, is an 18th century copy of Admiral Zheng He's 1417 map. Mr Menzies argues that it clearly shows North American rivers and coasts, as well as the continent of South America.
Mr Menzie's assertion about Zheng He's voyage to the New World isn't new - he first wrote about it in 2002 - but the map is.
Mr Liu had the map authenticated by an appraiser from Christie's Auctions, who said that the document was 'very old' and was not a newly-made fake.
After Mr Liu brought the map forward, Menzies also had a team of historians analyze every word on it. He concluded that it was originally written in the Ming Dynasty - a Chinese period that lasted from 1368 to 1644.
In the region of the map that Mr Menzies believes refers to Peru are written the inscriptions - 'Here the people practiced the religion of Paracas' and 'Here the people practice human sacrifice' - clear references peoples known to have inhabited Peru at the time.
The map is further corroborated, Mr Menzies says, by the Chinese names of numerous towns and regions in Peru.
He says old Peruvian maps show places with names like Chawan - Chinese for 'land prepared for sowing' and Chulin - 'wood or forest.'
Ko-Lan - a remote Peruvian town at the bottom of a ravine translates to 'difficult passage.'
Controversial: Gavin Menzies, 76, has been arguing for more than a decade that the Chinese and other Asians discovered the Ne World. 'Who Discovered America? - due out today - is his fourth book on the topic
Mr Menzies calls the story that Christopher Columbus' discovered America in 1492 a 'fairy tale' - saying he was not only not the first explorer - he was 40,000 years late
Mr Menzies has no formal training as a historian and no advanced degree from a major university - he was a submariner in the British Royal Navy - but he can no longer be called an ‘amateur.’
‘Who Discovered America?’ is Menzie’s fourth book in which he tries to re-write history and orient it East.
He has plowed millions of dollars of his proceeds from his books into continuing his world-traveling research into his theories. He has turned his north London home into a de facto research institute, employing up to six research assistants at a time.
But his theories are not accepted by the mainstream academic community. In 2008, University of London history professor Felipe Fernandez-Armesto told the Daily Telegraph that his books are 'the historical equivalent of stories about Elvis Presley in (the supermarket) and close encounters with alien hamsters.'
Even Wikipedia characterizes Menzies as a 'pseudo-historian.'
That has not stopped him from gaining millions of readers - and thousands of followers who contribute to his website and contribute research of their own.
Menzies say this map of the Ancash province of Peru shows numerous Chinese names of villages
Each of these dots represents a Peruvian town that reportedly has a Chinese name. It is claimed this is evidence of Chinese colonization before Columbus
Mr Menzies debuted his Asia-centric theories with 2002's '1421: The Year China Discovered the World.' In it, he said that the famed Chinese sailor Admiral Zheng He, who is known to have reached Europe and Africa, also crossed the Pacific Ocean to the Western Hemisphere.
He claims that Zheng He not only reached the New World, he left colonies there. His fleet also sailed around the tip of South America - through the Strait of Megellan around the Gulf of Mexico and up the Mississippi.
There is evidence, both archaeological and genetic, Menzies says, that Zheng He left his mark in California, Florida, Virginia and even the Outer Banks of North Carolina.
In 'Who Discovered America?' Menzies focuses on theories that Asians also made it to North and South America by sea long before even Zheng He.
'It appears certain that man reached the Americas by sea at least forty thousands years ago,' Menzies writes.
This Venetian map was made from information brought back from China by Marco Polo and Nicolo da Conti. Mr Menzies says it shows North and Central America - upside-down, oriented with north at the bottom
'Doubtless this date will be continuously pushed back, probably to 100,000 BC, which was when the first peoples sailed the Mediterranean to Crete and (separately) in the south from Asia to Australia.'
Most scientists believe man first widely populated the Western Hemisphere 13,000 to 16,500 years ago.
The almost universally-held theory among academics is that man came to the New World by crossing the Bering Strait land-bridge between Asia and North America.
'The more I thought about the Bering Straight theory of populating the Americas, the more ridiculous it became,' Mr Menzies writes about his investigation of the topic
Mr Menzies says the idea that man was able to cross the Pacific Ocean around 40,000 BC isn't nearly as dramatic as it seems.
'If you just go out in a plastic bath tub, the currents will just carry you there,' he told MailOnline. 'They just came with the current, it’s as simple as that.'
He added: 'There’s nothing terribly remarkable about. Man has been seafaring for vastly longer than convention credit has given them credit for.'
Nikola Tesla, godfather of the 20th Century, deserves more credit
By Michael Pravica on Monday, May 11th, 2009 - 1,171 words.
2006 was the sesquicentennial of the birth of one of the worlds greatest geniuses, the Serbian-American inventor Nikola Tesla. UNESCO dubbed 2006 the “year of Nikola Tesla.” Though you may have heard of the word “Tesla” as a unit of magnetic field (e.g. produced by an MRI machine); the ubiquitous discharging Tesla Coil seen in the old Frankenstein movies and at the Boston Museum of Science; a famous rock group; the name of Belgrade’s airport; David Bowie in “The Prestige”; or as a recently-introduced electric car company, few people are actually aware of the tremendous contributions made for us all by the refined, attractive yet deeply eccentric gentleman behind the name.
Born in 1856 to Serbian parents in a small village, Smiljan (which I visited in 1988), in the Austro-Hungarian empire (today’s Croatia), Tesla’s story of coming to America at age 28 with four cents in his pocket and “transforming” all society as we know it with his inventions was the quintessential story of the immigrants who made America what it is today. After quitting his employment with Thomas Edison who betrayed him, the young inventor went on to single-handedly invent the polyphase system of current generation (known as Alternating Current or “AC”) which ultimately overtook Edison’s Direct Current system as the superior method to transport electrical energy long distances and convert that energy into useful mechanical work.
Tesla first harnessed the enormous power of Niagara Falls as he built the world’s first hydroelectric power station there. Significant fractions of nations’ budgets in e.g, China (Three Gorges Dam), Zambia (Kariba Dam), and our own country (Hoover Dam) are dedicated to developing hydropower where the benefits of “free” power (many Gigawatts) can last for centuries. Today’s nuclear power industry is fashioned on the same basic principles of hydropower: the expansion of steam turns a turbine/dynamo, generating electrical power. The 60 Hz standard of our AC was set by Tesla. His designs for the electric dynamo are still in use today. Tesla also developed the polyphase electric motor which was suited for alternating current as well as the transformer which allowed easy and highly efficient conversion of voltage. The washing machine, dryer, garbage disposal, dishwasher, refrigerator, alternators, heat exchangers/air conditioners, fans, are all example of machines utilizing electric polyphase motors at their core. The Tesla Coil, popular in science museums and movies, enables the generation of enormous high frequency voltages sufficient to create lightning just as he did in Colorado Springs.
Tesla’s inventions had a far greater scope than just household-limited gadgets. His high frequency and high voltage research led to the development of the fluorescent light bulb, and he was likely the first person to create and study x-rays. He was also instrumental in developing the first particle accelerators due to his high voltage and high frequency contributions. Tesla invented the concept of “remote control” when he created a small remotely-controlled boat and submarine for the military. Sadly, the US military was far too primitive at the time to comprehend the use and scope of the invention until many years later. Tesla’s vision of modern warfare involved combat between robots and missiles instead of between human soldiers, thereby reducing casualties considerably. This closely resembles the modus operandi of today’s military (consider e.g. drones and guided missiles) except, tragically, that NATO, led by the US, illegally and viciously bombed his ancestral homeland slaughtering hundreds of civilians in Serbia in 1999 using the same technology that he enabled. So much for the gratitude of some American leaders!
Tesla was the first person to propose the concept of modern radar in 1900 and also invented a prototype spark plug for autos in 1898. Nikola Tesla was the true father of the radio, not Guglielmo Marconi, as recognized (posthumously by a few months) by the US Supreme Court in 1943. It was Tesla’s idea to use two tuned circuits (one for the transmitter, the other for the receiver) to broadcast information and energy from one to the other and reduce the chance of noise and interference between other transmitters. Without this concept, radio would be useless. Television, satellites, GPS, and cellular phones were all made possible by Tesla’s high frequency research and development of the wireless transmission of energy. Marconi visited Tesla’s lab in New York and incorporated Tesla’s inventions but never credited the inventor for this. Sadly, Marconi received the Nobel Prize and millions of dollars in royalties for his development of the radio. Tesla received nothing for his contribution.
Nikola Tesla was one of the most prolific inventors in human history with some 700 patents to his credit. Yet, for complex reasons, he is not given the credit sorely due him. Most of his failures can be ascribed to his lack of business sense, vicious competition from his rivals, and difficulties in securing the necessary funding for his work. He passed away on Orthodox Christmas, January 7, 1943 in the New Yorker Hotel, alone and a pauper. His cremated remains lie in a museum in Belgrade along with some of the papers/notebooks from his lifelong work.
It is my desire that Americans learn more about Nikola Tesla not only to develop some sense of appreciation for this gentleman’s tireless efforts, but that he also serve as an inspiration to us all in the realization of just how much one human being can do to improve the world. Tesla’s story is also a story of how important it is to fund innovation in an era where companies are increasingly looking to the “bottom line” and less inclined to fund research, and the US government, saddled with the costly occupation in Iraq also seems less interested in funding scientific research.
In a day and age where we worship entertainment “heroes” who honestly contribute little to bettering all humanity, we have completely lost perspective of who the real heroes are in our society – scientists and engineers such as Nikola Tesla — who more than anyone have improved all of our lives through their tireless and more often than not unrewarded sacrifices.
Nikola Tesla can rightly be considered the godfather of the 20th Century and beyond. When discussing the lack of credit for his achievements, Tesla once remarked: “The present is theirs, the future, for which I have really worked is mine.”
I encourage everyone to learn more about one of humanity’s greatest unsung heroes and remedy this gross neglect by recognizing his place in human history. A good start would be to declare his laboratory at Wardenclyffe a national historic monument. A website that is useful as a starting point for this goal is here.
No comments:
Post a Comment