Thursday, September 5, 2013

Những Hợp Đồng Máu và Bọn Tập Đoàn Đại Phú Gia


Chỉ riêng trong  năm 2013, Bộ quốc phòng Mỹ đã chi ra ít nhất hơn 16 tỉ mỹ kim ( $16,000,324,569) cho những "hợp đồng" an ninh quân sự!!!

Tướng Butler đã từng vạch rõ những bộ mặt của bọn tậpm đoàn đại gia đạt lợi từ chiến tranh.  Trò làm Giầu bằng xác chết và sự tan vỡ khổ đau của hàng triệu con người!  Eisenhower gọi chiến tranh là thủ đoạn ăn cắp cơm áo của dân nghèo! 

Chỉ có bọn buôn máu người là nhảy cẫng vui mừng vỗ tay khi chiến tranh lan đến, bởi chúng  sẽ trở thành đại phú nhanh gọn. Thế nhưng không chỉ bàn tay của bọn tập đoàn này là nhúng máu, mà ngay những kẻ thừa hành "công nhân" cũng vấy máu. Những công nhân của các tập đoán này họ tỉnh bơ trả lời khi được hỏi " Tôi chẳng bận tâm những chuyện liên can , miễn tôi có việc làm lãnh lương cao là vui rồi (I don't care, whatever, as long as I got a good job). Kẻ thừa hành tra tấn người ta cũng thế" Tôi chẳng áy náy, tôi làm việc và lãnh tiền" (I don't bother, I do my job to pay my bills)... Cho đến khi chính người thân của họ và chính bản thân của họ trở thành nạn nhân, họ sẽ la làng và  kêu gào mọi người quan tâm đến "thàm cảnh" của họ...Nhưng hiện tại ai cũng nghĩ" chuyện này chẳng bao giờ xảy đến với tôi cả" (this won't happen to me)...


Chiến Tranh là trò làm tiền GIAN MANH. Nó lúc nào cũng vậy.Nó có thể là phương cách cổ xưa nhất, cách sinh lợi dễ dàng nhất, chắc chắn là cách độc ác nhất. Nó là cách duy nhất ở kích thước quốc tế. Nó là cách độc nhất mà lợi lộc được tính bằng đô-là và mất mát bằng sinh mạng con người. (WAR is a racket. It always has been. It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives.)
 
 Tướng Dwight D. Eisenhower (Đại Tướng , Tổng Thống Mỹ)  Tôi căm ghét Chiến Tranh chỉ vì Tôi là một người lính từng sống trong đó có thể ghét, chỉ vì là người đã thấy sự tàn bạo của nó, sư vô ích của nó, sự ngu xuẩn của nó....... Từng khẩu súng được chế tạo, từng chiến hạm ra khơi, từng trái pháo được bắn đi, biểu hiện trong một ý nghĩa cuối cùng là một hành động ăn cắp của những người đói khổ mà không có ăn, của những người chết rét mà không có mặc.. (I hate war as only a soldier who has lived it can, only as one who has seen its brutality, its futility, its stupidity.......Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired, signifies in the final sense a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. Four Star-General-President of The USA, Dwight D. Eisenhower)

Wednesday, 4. September 2013
DOD Spent at Least $16,000,324,569.00 on 238 Distinct Contracts during July 2013
The Pentagon issues a list of contracts every business day around 5:00PM local time. Each list, a jumble of technical terms, is organized according to the purchases made by each military branch (e.g. Army, Navy, and Air Force) and institution (e.g. DARPA, Missile Defense Agency, and Defense Information Systems Agency). This project provides a distilled presentation of these contracts in an accessible form.
The Department of Defense spent at least $16,000,324,569.00 on 238 distinct contracts during July 2013. These funds went to many areas (e.g. Foreign Military Sales, operations in Afghanistan, Salient Contracts, and unmanned aerial systems). The following is a valuable resource for academics and concerned citizens alike.
FOREIGN MILITARY SALES
Through Foreign Military Sales (FMS), the U.S. government procures and transfers materiel to nations and international organizations. During the month of July 2013, the Pentagon issued the following twenty-three FMS contracts, which involved twenty-eight countries. Saudi Arabia received eight contracts, which was more than any other country. Boeing was patronized more than any other corporation, having received five distinct contracts. The FMS breakdown for July 2013 follows:
Advanced Technology Systems received $26,666,806 for procuring tetra trunked radio communication systems for the Lebanese Armed Forces.
AECOM Technical Services, CH2M Hill International Services, HDR Engineering and URS Group receive a maximum $9,000,000 for administrative and general management consulting services. This contract involved the following countries: Australia, Bangladesh, Cambodia, Maldives, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Mongolia, New Zealand, Palau and Papua.
Airborne Systems North American of CA received a maximum $12,945,226 for the procurement and inspection of MC-4 personnel parachutes. This contract involved only the Republic of Korea.
BAE received $9,222,314 for engineering services in support of the MK 41 vertical launching system. Parties to this contract were: the U.S. Navy (96.02 percent); South Korea (3.49 percent = $321,859); Netherlands (.38 percent = $35,045); and Canada (.11 percent = $10,145).
Boeing received $109,461,580 for services in support of the Royal Saudi Land Force Aviation Command. Boeing received $15,425,233 for procuring Apache Block III aircraft for Saudi Arabia. Boeing received $17,028,790 for the procurement of CH-47 cargo aircraft for Australia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Boeing received $75,598,874 for providing courseware development and training during the Royal Saudi Air Force’s transition from F-15 variants to the F-15SA weapon system. Boeing received a maximum $7,745,923 for providing the Netherlands with sustainment services in support of the Apache AH-64D.
Booz Allen Hamilton received $21,743,595 for providing training, education, engineering, financial management, C4I, EW, personnel management, technical support and logistics. This contract only involved the Royal Saudi Naval Force.
DRS Radar Systems received a maximum of $8,105,505 for the procurement of a border surveillance system for Egypt.
Exelis Inc. received a maximum of $7,553,934 for the procurement of night-vision devices and related equipment for Canada.
General Dynamics received $67,456,648 for the procurement of hydra rockets, warheads and related parts in support of the U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force and Saudi Arabia.
HELLFIRE Systems received $7,582,999 to “convert HELLFIRE II Romeo Air-to-Ground Missiles to AGM-114R2 and AGM-114R9E.” The parties of this contract are: Australia, Saudi Arabia and the UAE.
Kay and Associates received $36,698,404 for providing Kuwait with F/A-18 contractor maintenance support services.
Lockheed Martin received $12,980,000 for “the advanced procurement of one Israel C-130J-30 aircraft and for providing Israel with “field services representatives.” Lockheed Martin received $308,321,789 for the procurement of tactical missiles and launcher modification kits for Kuwait. Lockheed Martin received $37,375,568 to provide the UAE with services “in support of the enhanced launcher electronic station cost reduction initiatives.”
Northrop Grumman received $45,987,322 for the “production of proof of manufacturing/first articles, functional item replacement level components of the MK 54 mod 0 array kits, engineering service and support. The parties to this contract were the U.S. Navy (52 percent); Australia (41 percent = $18,854,802); and India(7 percent = $3,219,113). Northrop Grumman received $10,397,099 for services in support of critical components for U.S. and Coalition Partners in Afghanistan.
QinetiQ North America received $7,772,646 for procurement of Talon IV EOD vehicles, spares and training. This FMS contract went to Pakistan.
Raytheon received $19,070,236 for Standard Missile engineering and technical services. Parties to this contract were: Japan (28 percent = $5,339,666); Australia (24 percent = $4,576,857); Korea (21.5 percent = $4,100,101); Germany (8.3 percent = $1,582,830); Netherlands (8.3 percent = $1,582,830); Taiwan (7 percent = $1,334,917); Canada (1.7 percent = $324,194); Spain (1.2 percent = $228,843). Raytheon received $83,785,417 to provide UAE with technical services for AN/TPY-2 radars, which are “being delivered as part of a whole FMS case as an element of the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) system.”
Rockwell Collins Simulation & Training Solutions received a maximum of $22,240,000 to provide Saudi Arabia with transportable Black Hawk operations simulator devices.
Seiler Instrument and Manufacturing received a maximum $20,727,996 for the procurement of M2A2 Aiming Circle instruments. This contract involved the following countries: Afghanistan, Thailand, Saudi Arabia and Iraq.
SALIENT CONTRACTS – ALARMING PENTAGON FOCI
From these contracts we learn DARPA, the Pentagon’s most advanced research arm, is tinkering with social media in an effort to sway public opinion. Other alarming foci are present below. If these contracts are any indication, the U.S. tax-dollar is being spent on questionable aims:
A-T Solutions received a maximum $16,834,335 for services “in support of the Asymmetric Warfare Group’s mission observe, train and advise how to defeat asymmetric and hybrid threats.”
BAE received $29,023,781 in order to support DARPA’s Insight program, which is developing an adaptable, integrated human-machine exploitationand resource management system.
Utah State University Research Foundation received a maximum $12,000,000 for R&D services in support of the Precision Lightweight Weapon and Sensor Mount program. [Editor’s note: This is another example of the Pentagon using academia to further its own narrow military goals. One might contend that lucrative Pentagon funding can corrupt university research while diverting finite academic resources towards the purposes of war.]
IBM received $7,788,423 for the development of a scalable graph analytic and statistical learning methods to detect abnormal behavior from large, dynamic and heterogeneous media.
Berry Aviation received $10,725,000 for Trans-Sahara short take-off and landing (STOL) services. The Trans-Sahara STOL contract provides for casualty evacuation, personnel airlift, cargo airlift, and air drop services. Work will be performed throughout Algeria, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, Kenya, Libya, Mali, Mauritania, Morocco, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Sudan, South Sudan, Tunisia, and Uganda. The estimated date of completion is 27 June 2017. Some of this funding comes from Joint Special Operations Air Detachment 3400 Operations and Maintenance funds. [Editor’s note: We learn from this contract that USAFRICOM will be operating in all of the aforementioned countries through 2017. Where is the democratic debate within the U.S. about committing military assets to these nations?]
CGI Federal received $45,581,891 for services in support of the Human Terrain System requirement. [Editor’s note: The Pentagon’s Human Terrainprogram uses anthropologists to further military goals within warzones. Most anthropologists loathe the militarization/weaponization of their field.]
Systems & Technology Research received $7,477,220 for working on DARPA’s social media in strategic communication program.
Raytheon Oakley Systems received $7,932,976 for the research and development services in support of the detection of insider threats by identifying behaviors.
Kellogg Brown & Root Services received a maximum $134,151,953 for the development and construction of a land-based missile defense system in Deveselu, Romania.
AFGHANISTAN CONTRACTS
In July 2013, the Pentagon issued twelve distinct contracts to corporations receiving money to work in Afghanistan. These contracts contradict assertions that the U.S. military will significantly reduce its forces in Afghanistan during 2014. These contracts illustrate the Pentagon’s clear intent to remain in Afghanistan for an indefinite timeframe:
DRS Technical Services received $25,511,888 for the “development, deployment and maintenance of tactical and management information technology systems and products.” Work will be performed in Afghanistan.
General Dynamics received $12,002,200 for “total integrated ground equipment readiness contractor logistics support.” 57 percent ($6,841,254) of this work will be performed in Camp Leatherneck, Afghanistan. Work is expected to be completed by September 2014.
Inglett & Stubbs International received a maximum of $11,391,894 for inspection and repair services in Afghanistan.
Jorge Scientific received $11,810,908 to provide counterinsurgency advisory and assistance team services throughout Afghanistan.
Leonie Industries received $48,852,000 for media and marketing services in support of the Information Operations Task Force-Afghanistan. [Editor’s note: Based on this description, this is essentially a contract wherein tax-dollars are used to market an unpopular war to a defiant people.]
Lockheed Martin received $14,623,204 for field service representatives in support of the vehicle optic surveillance system program, program manager, Marine Air Ground Task Force command, control and communications. 80 percent ($11,698,563) of the work will be performed in Afghanistan.
Logos Technologies received $9,286,625 for 19 donut hole kits to support the U.S. Army persistent ground surveillance systems Kestrel systems. 90 percent ($8,357,963) of the work will be performed in Afghanistan.
Navmar Applied Sciences received $11,207,449 in support of the persistent surveillance unmanned aerial system (PSUAS) for the U.S. Army. This contract includes the procurement of 15 additional Tiger Shark PSUAS air vehicles and 15 i200 turrets, which will be integrated into the PSUAS. 28 percent ($3,138,086) of the work will occur within the sovereign nation of Afghanistan.
Northrop Grumman received $38,353,781 for services in support of the vehicle and dismount exploitation radar system. Work will be performed in Afghanistan. 
PKL Services received $16,300,156 for maintenance in support of Marine Corps AH-1W, UH-1N, CH-53D/E, and CH-46E platforms. 22 percent ($3,586,034) of the work will be performed in Iraq/Afghanistan. Work expected to be completed in February 2014. 
SAIC received $30,000,000 for operations and maintenance of the Angel Fire Spiral 2/Blue Devil Block I sensor/ISR suites. Work will be performed in Afghanistan. 
Trace Systems received $6,953,728 to procure information technology support services in Afghanistan.
DRONES – A DIVERSE PORTFOLIO
These contracts are for a variety of unmanned aerial systems (UAS), which are commonly known as drones. Only one of the companies, General Atomics, is associated with the most prominent drones on the market, namely the Predator and the Reaper. The range of companies associated with drone technology, as evident below, is a testament to the breadth and lucrative nature of the UAS market:
Bosh Global Services received a maximum $60,000,000 for small unmanned aircraft systems training, logistics support and technical management services.
CAE USA received $19,806,624 for MQ-1/9 contract aircrew training and courseware development training. Work will be performed at Creech Air Force Base, Holloman Air Force Base, March Air Reserve Base, Hancock Field and “other locations that may be required in the future in accordance with the performance work statement.”
General Atomics received $23,951,449 for systems tasks, upgrades and service on the “MQ-9 Hunter and Killer System Development and Demonstration (SDD) bridge effort.”
Insitu Inc. received $8,528,000 to “address hardware obsolescence issues and align two previously delivered early operational capability RQ-21A small tactical unmanned aircraft systems to the current system configuration.”
URS Technical Services received $14,219,315 for supporting ACC’s Unmanned Aircraft System Operations Center, including MQ-1 Predator and MQ-9 Reaper platforms. Work will be performed at Creech Air Force Base, Ellsworth Air Force Base, Holloman Air Force Base and Whiteman Air Force Base. Eight percent ($1,137,545) of the effort supports foreign military sales for the United Kingdom. 
AMBIGUITY AND IMPRECISION
Many U.S. citizens, entrenched in the duopoly paradigm of Red-Blue politics, believe the Obama Administration has embraced transparency. The following contracts highlight precisely how opaque Obama’s Pentagon is:
Advanced Mission Systems received $8,437,960 for training and instruction services. EADS received $21,767,416 for continued contractor logistical support services. CGI Federal received $48,295,193 for “operational and environment core function services to provide the common framework in which war-fighting programs and strategies are conceived, defined and executed.” Lockheed Martin received $138,476,929 for communications technical support services for the U.S. Air Force Central Command. Jacobs Technology received a maximum $45,000,000 for the procurement of global logistics and support services. SAP Government Support and Services received a maximum $7,148,785 for services in support of enterprise resource planning.
None of these contracts tell the U.S. taxpayers, who fund the U.S. Department of Defense, a single detail about the final destination of their tax-dollars.
POLLUTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL CLEAN-UP
The Pentagon leaves behind a toxic footprint at old weapons ranges and sundry bases. In July 2013, the Pentagon issued ten distinct contracts involving some form of environmental clean-up:
AECOM, Tidewater, EA Engineering, SAIC, ARCADIS U.S. and Jacobs Engineering Group received a maximum $125,000,000 for the removal and clean-up efforts of hazardous, toxic and radioactive waste and military munitions. Tetra Tech, GMI-AECOM and CH2M Hill received a maximum $75,000,000 to “accomplish natural resource services and compliance and related environmental planning services in support of the U.S. Navy.” ECC Remediation Services received a maximum $40,000,000 for various services in support of the Military Munitions Response Program.
Weeks Marine received a maximum $14,295,950 for services in support of the Maryland Beach e-nourishment Project. URS Federal Services received $19,550,631 for hazardous materials management services. Bay West, Engineering Remediation Resources Group, RMC South Earth, HydroGeologic, EA Engineering, Science and Technology, North Wind, Earth Resources Technology, Bhate Environmental Associates, PIKA/Arcadis and Zapata Inc. received a maximum $250,000,000 for the environmental remediation services in support of the Military Munitions Response Program.
GPC received a maximum $250,000,000 for services to manage, maintain and operate the emergency ship salvage material system (ESSM) and support the Navy’s oil and hazardous substances spill response program. Brady G2, Enviro Compliance Solutions, Accord Engineering, RORE-ITSI Joint Venture and Environmental Cost Management received $15,000,000 for “environmental consulting services” in support of various government programs. This contract includes support for guiding and managing environmental projects and environmental reporting and document preparation.
TriEco/Tetra Tech received a maximum $7,500,000 for “hazardous material and waste management services in Texas, Mississippi, and Louisiana.” FPM Remediations received $13,267,405 for environmental remediation activities at Joint Base Charleston, SC and Seymour Johnson Air Force Base, NC.
NO COMPETITION – HOW DOD PROCURES NUMEROUS CONTRACTS
The Pentagon often exploits various rules and bylaws in order to expedite contract production or to avoid subjecting contracts to a competitive bidding process. At least the Pentagon is honest in this respect; it included clauses stating “this contract was not competitively procured” in eight contracts during July 2013:
General Electric received $15,691,247 for the procurement of “time critical parts for incorporation into the T-408-GE-400 gas turbine engine in support of the CH-53K helicopter program” This contract was not competitively procured pursuant to FAR 6.302-2-1(a)(1). 
SAIC received $6,976,110 for training and support for U.S. Fleet Forces Command, associated fleet commands and activities conducting fleet training. This contract was not competitively procured in accordance with FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i)(A), “Unusual and Compelling Urgency.” 
Andromeda Systems received $7,700,000 for delivering software tools in support of maintenance planning, scheduling, and execution (MPS&E) and for integrating this software across the Naval Aviation Enterprise. These software tools originated with the E-6B aircraft and will now be developed for Naval Aviation Enterprise-wide usage. This contract was not competitively procured pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 2304(c)(1). 
Data Link Solutions received $33,368,569 to develop, design and implement four nets of concurrent multi-netting with concurrent contention receive (CMN-4) on the multifunctional information distribution system joint tactical radio system (MIDS JTRS) terminal configuration. This delivery order was not competitively procured in accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2304(c)(1). 
Lockheed Martin received $39,427,558 to provide flight test, technical, management, and process support services in support of the MH-60R/S and SH-60B aircraft. This contract was not competitively procured pursuant to 10 USC 2304(c)(1). 
Harris Corp. received $22,117,791 for Harris radios and associated components which will be utilized within the CBRNE Response enterprise that interfaces with first responders, National Guard teams, military tactical components, law enforcement, and other Department of Defense (DOD) entities.  This contract was not competitively procured pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 2304(c)(1). 
Lockheed Martin received $12,878,468 for the repair coverage of 25 items for the common cockpit of the H-60R/S helicopters. The contract was not competitively procured in accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2304(c)(1). 
Northrop Grumman received $24,859,823 for providing repair parts to the Navy. The contract was not competitively procured in accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2304(c)(1). 
U.S. NAVY
Eleven companies furnished fifteen contracts pertaining to the U.S. Navy. These contracts totaled $326,849,904 and cost between $7,526,038 and $110,781,296. BAE took home five distinct contracts within this group. The remaining contracts went to: 3 Phoenix, AMTEK SCP, BAE, CACI, Computer Sciences Corporation, EDO Professional Services, General Dynamics, Oceaneering International, Raytheon, Rite Solutions, and SEACON Phoenix.
CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE
Forty-six companies (including some joint ventures) serviced thirty-five distinct contracts pertaining to DOD Construction & Maintenance. These contracts totaled $2,786,063,446 and cost between $6,633,675 and $712,000,000. (The latter amount was paid to three companies for construction and services “in support of the Air Force medical service healthcare facilities modernization program”).
These projects included, but were not limited to: design services for energy efficient projects and services; renovation of existing aircraft maintenance facilities; construction of a dental clinic facility at Fort Leonard Wood, MO; construction of a new cadet barracks at the U.S. Military Academy; construction of airfield security upgrades at Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort; construction services in support of the Defense Logistics Agency; construction services in support of the Kansas Army National Guard; maintenance, repair and operations for South Central Zone 2 Region, North Central Region and South Central Zone 1 Region; renovation of Scott Barracks at the U.S. Military Academy; upgrades in facilities at Naval Base Guam; construction at the Nolan Building parking garage at Fort Belvoir, VA; and the purchase of various metals.
The companies include: Anthony and Gordon Construction; B & K Construction Company; Barnhill Contracting; BCI Construction USA; BME & Sons; CCI Solutions; CH2M Hill/Clark Nexsen Energy Partners Joint Venture; Dutra Dredging; Federal Contracting Inc. (doing business as Bryan Construction); FSA + JKC Joint Venture One; Gilbane Federal; J E Dunn Construction; United Excel Corporation; Graybar Electric Company; Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company; Greenway Enterprises; Hensel Phelps Construction; HITT Contracting; Innovative Technical Solutions; Barlovento; Bhatel Brasfield & Gorrie;
CH2M HILL; Jacobs & Architects Hawaii Joint Venture; Johnson Controls Federal Systems; Smith & Wesson Security Solutions; Zachry Federal Construction; Kiewit Infrastructure South; LBL Contracting;
Lifecycle Construction Services; PentaCon; Anthony & Gordon Construction; Luhr Bros; MACNAK & Korte Joint Venture; Massman Construction; Nan Inc.; Necaise Brothers Construction; Norfolk Dredging; Phylway Construction; SAIC; Senne & Company; SourceAmerica; SupplyCore; SURVICE Engineering Company; Turner Strategic Technologies; TW Metals; and Walsh Construction Company II.
SUPPORT, EQUIPMENT, PARTS AND TRAINING
Although this category encompasses a wide variety of products and services, all of the contracts pertain to supporting, equipping, or training the soldier, sailor, airman and Marine:
Accenture received $50,137,716 for services in support of the General Fund Enterprise Business System. AQUATE Corp. received $15,313,067 for products and services to joint program offices and other federal agency customers dependent on CBRN and high yield explosives equipment in support of their missions. Armorsource received a maximum $92,681,250 for procurement of lightweight, advanced combat helmets.
Carter Enterprises received $58,111,772 for the procurement of soldier plate carrier systems and related items and services. Carter Industries received a maximum $9,244,800 for improved combat vehicle crewmen universal camouflage pattern coveralls. Center Industries received a maximum $44,270,394 for the procurement of improved magazines for the M4/M4A1 carbine.
Champion Energy Services received $729,167 for retail electric service. Critigen-Clark Nexsen Joint Venture received a maximum $35,000,000 for geographic information systems, professional surveying and mapping services. First Support Services received $6,960,811 for continuation of ground support equipment maintenance services.
General Dynamics received $8,534,065 for the procurement of 20mm MK244-0 armor piercing discarding Sabot cartridges. GPS Source received a maximum $16,613,430 for the procurement of defense advanced global positioning system receiver distributed devices. HDT Tactical Systems and Design West Technologies received a maximum $10,967,588 for the procurement of M98 gas filters and M98 gas-particulate filter sets.
ICx Technologies Inc. (doing business as Agentase Inc.) received $21,768,549 for services in support of the Joint Program Manager for Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Contamination Avoidance program.
Iris Technology received $6,622,350 for the procurement of 1,325 solar power adaptors (SPA II) in support of the Product Manager Expeditionary Power Systems, Program Manager Combat Service Support. Isometrics received a maximum $48,480,975 for the procurement of modular fuel system — tank rack modules and associated services.
Lockheed Martin received $101,604,039 for the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program. Lockheed Martin received $11,796,483 to fabricate, test, and deliver a spectral beam combined fiber laser subsystem. Lockheed Martin received $35,604,779 for the development of the M270A1 fire control system.
Manufacturing Techniques received $16,196,816 for lowest replaceable units and upgrade kits for ground based operational surveillance system (GBOSS) to be used by the U.S. Marine Corps. GBOSS systems provide “24-hour persistent, ground-based surveillance capability.” McRae Industries received a maximum $13,996,006 for Army hot weather combat boots.
Northrop Grumman received $12,915,678 to provide exercise and training support to command staff, battle staff, and Theater Special Operations Commands. Northrop Grumman received $59,568,528 for operation and maintenance services for the combined tactical training ranges. Northrop Grumman received $6,786,896 for the improvement of the joint tactical ground station system. Northrop Grumman received $7,586,449 for planning, programming and budgeting services. Northrop Grumman received $8,070,540 for the operation and maintenance of the Department of the Navy, NCIS law enforcement information exchange system and DOD law enforcement information system. Northrop Grumman received a maximum $17,225,000 for the procurement of repair and calibration of secondary items in support of the integrated family of test equipment.
NuStar Terminals Operations Partnership received maximum $23,347,060 for a fuel storage terminal and services to receive, store, and ship government owned petroleum products. Parker Hannifin received a maximum $181,700,000 for wheel equipment, parts and assemblies. QinetiQ North America received $20,359,579 for procurement of man transportable robotic system (MTRS) MK 2 post-production support for joint service explosive ordnance disposal.
Raytheon received $9,618,024 for the repair of the H-60 multi-spectral targeting system forward looking infrared turrets. Raytheon received a maximum $83,500,000 for spare parts, components and repairs for various radar systems.
SRCTec Inc. received a maximum $221,800,000 for the procurement of lightweight counter mortar radars and related parts and services. Systems, Planning, and Analysis received $7,046,611 for support to the Office of International Technology Security in planning and executing the Military Critical Technology Program. Technical and Project Engineering received a maximum $10,751,221 for services in support of the Army training models.
Tecmotiv received a maximum $11,025,485 for depot-level engine repairs in support of the M88A2 Heavy Recovery Vehicle. URS Federal Services received $11,844,224 for material distribution services including receipt, storage, and issue.
MISSILES AND MISSILE DEFENSE
BAE received $534,873,321 to provide engineering, support and training for the Minuteman III. Engineering Research and Consulting received $32,438,092 for research in propulsion sciences. Exelis Systems received $26,656,675 for Launch and Test Range System support functions to the Eastern and Western Range: range sustainment, and external user support, projects and engineering services. General Dynamics received $32,679,084 work on Aegis gun and guided-missile directors (MK82 Mod 0), Aegis director controllers (MK 200 Mod 0) and for associated material and engineering services and for six Aegis Weapon System ship sets. Gray Research received $21,886,024 (from $222,609,913 to $244,495,937) for providing data management services for the Missile Defense Data Center Program.
Lockheed Martin received $11,996,522 to support NORAD operations. In a separate contract, Lockheed Martin received $20,794,692 to support NORAD operations. Lockheed Martin received $295,017,067 (increasing the total contract value from $1,439,566,895 to $1,734,583,962) for servicing and developing the Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense Baseline. Lockheed Martin received $9,552,979 to provide security hardware, associated software, equipment installation, system test, accreditation, certification and delivery of nuclear weapon security system equipment at U.S. Navy Installations.
Raytheon lost $24,969,580 for reducing the quantity of Standard Missile-3 Block IB missiles manufactured from 24 to 20 and for resolving technical and production transition issues. Raytheon received $16,676,423 for the depot-level diagnostics and repair of the Patriot missile system. Raytheon received $402,880,000 for software maintenance; models and simulations; engineering support and Ballistic Missile Defense System test planning; and execution and analysis for X-Band radars. Raytheon received $57,234,211 (increasing the total contract value from $1,536,747,151 to $1,593,981,362) for Standard Missile-3 Block IIA future upgrades and engineering support.
AIRCRAFT PRODUCTION AND MAINTENANCE
Bell Helicopter (Textron) received $17,907,086 for systems engineering and program management services in support of the H-1 upgrade program. BGI received $36,795,547 for EC-130H & A-10 contract aircrew training and courseware development training programs.
Boeing received $17,001,833 for work on next generation jammer (NGJ) pod hardware integration in support of the EA-18G aircraft. Boeing received $2,042,060,385for the procurement of 13 P-8A multi-mission maritime Lot IV aircraft and 13 ancillary mission equipment kits in support of the LRIP Lot IV aircraft and associated parts. Boeing received $8,110,882 for the procurement of 84 engineering change proposal 6282 AYC 1439 A1 retrofit kits in support of the F/A-18 E/F aircraft. Boeing received a maximum $39,619,052 for logistics support and fielding and training services for units receiving the CH-47F.
Defense Support Services received $46,097,112 for maintaining aircraft in support of the Naval Test Wing Pacific at Point Mugu and China Lake Naval Air Stations, CA. DynCorp received $99,939,297 for maintenance and logistics support for all aircraft and support equipment for which the Naval Test Wing Atlantic has maintenance responsibility.
EADS received $12,921,227 for contractor logistics support for the Army’s aviation assets. General Atomics received $7,297,342 for the procurement of base support, aircraft material and demobilization services.
General Electric received $87,034,442 for the procurement of 22 Lot 17 full rate production F414-GE-400 install engines for the F/A-18E/F aircraft. General Electric received a maximum $6,896,800 for combustion chamber liners.
IKBI Inc. received a maximum $7,692,387 for the procurement of an HC-130J Simulator Facility at Moody Air Force Base, GA. L-3 Communications received $33,174,360 for procuring 12 tactical operational flight trainer (TOFT) HD visual system kits; for purchase and delivery of HD projectors and mirrors for the six TOFTs at Air Station Miramar; delivery of four TOFT HD visual systems to NAS Whidbey Island; purchase and delivery of uninterrupted power sources for four TOFTs to support the HD visual systems at NAS Oceana; and purchase and delivery of spares kit(s). This order also provides for theprocurement of HD visual systems for two Australian F/A-18E/F Super Hornets TOFTs for the Royal Australian Air Force (20 percent = $6,819,941).
Lockheed Martin received $53,600,000 for six B-2 line replaceable units, data, material lay-in, and overhaul management. Lockheed Martin received $70,358,000 to provide parts, material and components required for the delivery of seven Conventional Take Off and Landing F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter aircraft and one Short Take-Off Vertical Landing F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter aircraft for the government of Italy
Machining Technologies received a maximum $79,900,000 for the procurement of 120mm M31 tail fins. Moog Inc. received a maximum $7,674,650 for V-22 aircraft swashplate actuators.
Northrop Grumman received $617,058,000 for the production of five Full Rate Production Lot 1 E-2D Advanced Hawkeye aircraft. Work will be performed in St. Augustine, FL; Syracuse, NY; Bethpage, NY; El Segundo, CA; Indianapolis, Indiana; Menlo Park, CA; Rolling Meadows, IL; and approximately 200 various locations within the United States — none over five percent (32.10 percent). Northrop Grumman received $9,293,000 to procure materials and related support for the full rate production of five E-2D Advanced Hawkeye Lot 2 aircraft. Northrop Grumman received a maximum $40,278,672 for procurement of outer wing panels.
Raytheon received $279,400,000 in support of the Technology Development (TD) Phase of the Next Generation Jammer (NGJ) Program, which will replace the aging ALQ-99 tactical jamming system for integration on the EA-18G tactical aircraft.
Rockwell Collins received $13,569,781 for 19 low rate initial production modification kits for the KC-135 CNS/ATM Block 45 upgrade. Rolls Royce Corp. received $22,439,403 for additional power-by-the-hour in support of the KC-130J aircraft propulsion system.
Scientific Research Corp. received $8,974,067 for the procurement of 200 Multi-Function Color Display (MFCD) units and associated technical data to support forced retrofit of MFCD units into T-45 aircraft.
TRI-COR Industries received $73,903,803 for applications, infrastructure and systems support, Increment 2 (AISS II) services in support of the Mobility Air Force Command and control and in-transit visibility/business systems.
United Technologies Corp. received $133,979,288 for sustainment, site activation and depot activation efforts in support of the Joint Strike Fighter Propulsion System Low Rate Initial Production Lot VI governments of the UK ($2,889,881; 2.1 percent); Italy ($2,743,250; 2 percent); Turkey ($2,094,260; 1.6 percent); Australia ($2,094,260; 1.6 percent); the Netherlands ($1,779,956; 1.3 percent); Canada ($1,361,104; 1 percent); Norway ($1,005,376; .8 percent); and Denmark ($627,949; .4 percent).
Woodward HRT received a maximum $24,662,559 for supply spare parts to support numerous aircraft platforms.
CYBER, ISR, COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY AND COMMUNICATIONS
Bluewater Communications Group; Globecomm Systems; and TVC Communications received a maximum $45,000,000 to provide Cisco satellite decoders and HD encryption systems for the Defense Media Activity.
Booz Allen Hamilton; CACI; Computer Sciences Corporation; General Dynamics One Source; Honeywell Technology Solutions; Engility; Lockheed Martin; SAIC; Scientific Research Corporation; Secure Mission Solutions; STG; Systems Research and Applications Corporation; and URS Federal Services received $179,908,600 for ISR, cyber, and space capabilities work. Options would bring the cumulative value to $899,543,400.
BOSH Global Services; Imagine One StraCon Venture; ISHPI Information Technologies; Sentek Global
CENTECH Group received $14,015,472 for operation and maintenance of the base network.
Dell; IBM; Unicom Government; CDW Government; Iron Bow Technologies; and World Wide Technology received $494,000,000 for the hardware, software and related integration services in support of the Information Technology Enterprise Solution-2.
Deloitte Consulting received a maximum $23,000,000 for requirements analysis, design, development, testing, fielding, sustainment, and Tier 3 (developmental and operational) support for a library of web services to support the AF/A1 human resources information technology portfolio.
Design West Technologies received $20,878,535 for the production, assembly, testing, and packaging of Communication Transponder Family of Systems communication assemblies composed of printed circuit boards, electronic components, and external enclosures. Exelis received $7,866,232 for replenishment spare parts for core memory units.
Galois Inc. received $8,147,278 for advanced multi-integration sensor engineering reports, and to research and develop automated techniques by which mission planners can design and build robust cyber warfare plans using intuitive graphical interfaces, and develop tools that automatically synthesize such plans into fully detailed, executable missions. Gichner Shelter Systems received $25,519,650 for the procurement of up to 400 mobile facility production units and technical data items.
Lockheed Martin received $35,670,673 for the procurement of information technology services for the Pentagon & National Capital Region. Lockheed Martin received $8,791,515 for Interim Contractor Sustainment FY12-15 Additional Scope for the Advance Extremely High Frequency (AEHF) System Development and Demonstration Program (SDD).
Lockheed Martin; TYBRIN; Harris IT Services; SRA International; Raytheon; and L-3 National Security Solutions received $960,000,000 for Network-Centric Solutions-2 (NETCENTS-2) Application Services.
Progeny Systems received $10,989,287 for Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) Phase III engineering and technical support services in support of SBIR Topic No.N03-049, “Automation and Work Flow Advances Using Technology Infusions for Manning Reduction” – a Navy-wide implementation of portal technology for internal and external information sharing requirements.
Raytheon received $33,989,127 for developing and testing various command post terminals with presidential and national voice conferencing for the family of advanced beyond line-of-sight terminals. SAIC received $10,196,609 for services supporting Military Sealift Command’s (MSC) information technology (IT) ashore operations. Siemens Medical Solutions received a maximum $28,173,642 for digital imaging network-picture archive communication systems.
Skylla Engineering; and Chugach Federal Solution received $19,752,906 for equipment and services associated with C5S, ISR, information operations, enterprise information services and space capabilities. Software AG Government Solutions received $10,274,000 for software AG Flex Perpetual licenses and maintenance support.
Sotera Defense Systems received a maximum $97,850,000 for design, construction, testing and delivery services in support of the electronic warfare planning and management tool. SRI International received $230,000,000 for hardware, software, prototype systems, spiral software enhancements and installation training support for the Digital Video Laboratory III. Systems Engineering Support Company received $15,189,906 for Communication Transponder Family of Systems communication assemblies composed of printed circuit boards, electronic components, and external enclosures.
TeleCommunication Systems received $6,865,586 for the design, development, delivery, and evaluation of a prototype Intelligent Tutoring System capability and associated content for the Navy’s information technology rating “A” School at the Center for Information Dominance in Pensacola, FL.
Telecommunications Systems; By Light Professional IT Services; Cytech Communications; iGov Technologies; Sierra Nevada; and D & S Consultants received a maximum $48,000,000 for various command, control, communications and computer support services for users located at Fort Bragg, NC.
TT Government Solutions received $13,099,606 for OMEGA, which “provides for the development of technologies to construct mission plans and automatically synthesize plans to an executable mission script and to develop technologies to formally verify plans and quantify the expected effects and outcomes.” Mission construction involves the “development of cyber warfare domain specific languages, program synthesis and automated program construction from high-level specifications.”
Verizon received $11,935,014 for the procurement of managed network services.
ViaSat received $19,487,844 to develop and implement four nets of concurrent multi-netting with concurrent contention receive (CMN-4) on the multifunctional information distribution system joint tactical radio system (MIDS JTRS) terminal configuration. MIDS JTRS aims to transform the MIDS low volume terminal into a four-channel, software communications product, which will comply with joint tactical radio system terminals while maintaining current Link-16 and tactical air navigation capability.
FOOD SERVICES
Food Service Inc. received a maximum $660,000,000 for full line food distribution in support of customers located in Okinawa, Japan. Sysco Eastern Maryland (maximum $20,050,000); Sysco Foodservice Alabama (maximum $18,145,958); Sysco Hampton Roads (maximum $32,300,000); and US Foods ($37,120,746) were given contracts for prime vendor food and beverage support.
HEALTHCARE AND SANITATION
Fresenius Kabi received a maximum $67,798,372 for various pharmaceutical products. HamHed; Budget Services & Supplies; TATCO Services; and Radcorp Solutions received a maximum $20,000,000 for janitorial services. Marlex Pharmaceuticals Inc. received a maximum $56,598,301 for various pharmaceuticals. MedTrust received $20,381,274 for the extension of registered nursing services of various specialties. Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics received a maximum $14,097,291 for flu vaccines. Pacific Consolidated Industries received a maximum $21,000,000 for non-developmental electronic catalog system for electronic documents portable oxygen distribution system and accessories. Sanofi Pasteur received a maximum $14,216,201 for flu vaccines. TQM Inc. received a maximum $26,250,000 for medical equipment.
# # # #
Christian Sorensen, a BFP Contributing Author & Analyst, is a U.S. military veteran. His writing has been featured in CounterPunch and Media Roots.
*Any clerical errors are the author’s alone. In mid-September, Boiling Frogs Post will feature a similar distillation of August 2013’s DOD Contracts.

President John F Kennedy "Secret Society" Speech

A World Of Fear And Secret Wars
President John F Kennedy "Secret Society" Speech

The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.
President John F. Kennedy
Waldorf-Astoria Hotel, New York City
April 27, 1961

5 Minute excerpt from speech. Full audio and transcript below.
Posted October 15, 2012

Full Speech



President John F. Kennedy
Waldorf-Astoria Hotel, New York City
April 27, 1961
    Mr. Chairman, ladies and gentlemen:
     I appreciate very much your generous invitation to be here tonight.
     You bear heavy responsibilities these days and an article I read some time ago reminded me of how particularly heavily the burdens of present day events bear upon your profession.
     You may remember that in 1851 the New York Herald Tribune under the sponsorship and publishing of Horace Greeley, employed as its London correspondent an obscure journalist by the name of Karl Marx.
     We are told that foreign correspondent Marx, stone broke, and with a family ill and undernourished, constantly appealed to Greeley and managing editor Charles Dana for an increase in his munificent salary of $5 per installment, a salary which he and Engels ungratefully labeled as the "lousiest petty bourgeois cheating."
     But when all his financial appeals were refused, Marx looked around for other means of livelihood and fame, eventually terminating his relationship with the Tribune and devoting his talents full time to the cause that would bequeath the world the seeds of Leninism, Stalinism, revolution and the cold war.
     If only this capitalistic New York newspaper had treated him more kindly; if only Marx had remained a foreign correspondent, history might have been different. And I hope all publishers will bear this lesson in mind the next time they receive a poverty-stricken appeal for a small increase in the expense account from an obscure newspaper man.
     I have selected as the title of my remarks tonight "The President and the Press." Some may suggest that this would be more naturally worded "The President Versus the Press." But those are not my sentiments tonight.
     It is true, however, that when a well-known diplomat from another country demanded recently that our State Department repudiate certain newspaper attacks on his colleague it was unnecessary for us to reply that this Administration was not responsible for the press, for the press had already made it clear that it was not responsible for this Administration.
     Nevertheless, my purpose here tonight is not to deliver the usual assault on the so-called one party press. On the contrary, in recent months I have rarely heard any complaints about political bias in the press except from a few Republicans. Nor is it my purpose tonight to discuss or defend the televising of Presidential press conferences. I think it is highly beneficial to have some 20,000,000 Americans regularly sit in on these conferences to observe, if I may say so, the incisive, the intelligent and the courteous qualities displayed by your Washington correspondents.
     Nor, finally, are these remarks intended to examine the proper degree of privacy which the press should allow to any President and his family.
     If in the last few months your White House reporters and photographers have been attending church services with regularity, that has surely done them no harm.
     On the other hand, I realize that your staff and wire service photographers may be complaining that they do not enjoy the same green privileges at the local golf courses that they once did.
     It is true that my predecessor did not object as I do to pictures of one's golfing skill in action. But neither on the other hand did he ever bean a Secret Service man.
     My topic tonight is a more sober one of concern to publishers as well as editors.
     I want to talk about our common responsibilities in the face of a common danger. The events of recent weeks may have helped to illuminate that challenge for some; but the dimensions of its threat have loomed large on the horizon for many years. Whatever our hopes may be for the future--for reducing this threat or living with it--there is no escaping either the gravity or the totality of its challenge to our survival and to our security--a challenge that confronts us in unaccustomed ways in every sphere of human activity.
     This deadly challenge imposes upon our society two requirements of direct concern both to the press and to the President--two requirements that may seem almost contradictory in tone, but which must be reconciled and fulfilled if we are to meet this national peril. I refer, first, to the need for a far greater public information; and, second, to the need for far greater official secrecy.
I
     The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.
     But I do ask every publisher, every editor, and every newsman in the nation to reexamine his own standards, and to recognize the nature of our country's peril. In time of war, the government and the press have customarily joined in an effort based largely on self-discipline, to prevent unauthorized disclosures to the enemy. In time of "clear and present danger," the courts have held that even the privileged rights of the First Amendment must yield to the public's need for national security.
     Today no war has been declared--and however fierce the struggle may be, it may never be declared in the traditional fashion. Our way of life is under attack. Those who make themselves our enemy are advancing around the globe. The survival of our friends is in danger. And yet no war has been declared, no borders have been crossed by marching troops, no missiles have been fired.
     If the press is awaiting a declaration of war before it imposes the self-discipline of combat conditions, then I can only say that no war ever posed a greater threat to our security. If you are awaiting a finding of "clear and present danger," then I can only say that the danger has never been more clear and its presence has never been more imminent.
     It requires a change in outlook, a change in tactics, a change in missions--by the government, by the people, by every businessman or labor leader, and by every newspaper. For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.
     Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match.
     Nevertheless, every democracy recognizes the necessary restraints of national security--and the question remains whether those restraints need to be more strictly observed if we are to oppose this kind of attack as well as outright invasion.
     For the facts of the matter are that this nation's foes have openly boasted of acquiring through our newspapers information they would otherwise hire agents to acquire through theft, bribery or espionage; that details of this nation's covert preparations to counter the enemy's covert operations have been available to every newspaper reader, friend and foe alike; that the size, the strength, the location and the nature of our forces and weapons, and our plans and strategy for their use, have all been pinpointed in the press and other news media to a degree sufficient to satisfy any foreign power; and that, in at least in one case, the publication of details concerning a secret mechanism whereby satellites were followed required its alteration at the expense of considerable time and money.
     The newspapers which printed these stories were loyal, patriotic, responsible and well-meaning. Had we been engaged in open warfare, they undoubtedly would not have published such items. But in the absence of open warfare, they recognized only the tests of journalism and not the tests of national security. And my question tonight is whether additional tests should not now be adopted.
     The question is for you alone to answer. No public official should answer it for you. No governmental plan should impose its restraints against your will. But I would be failing in my duty to the nation, in considering all of the responsibilities that we now bear and all of the means at hand to meet those responsibilities, if I did not commend this problem to your attention, and urge its thoughtful consideration.
     On many earlier occasions, I have said--and your newspapers have constantly said--that these are times that appeal to every citizen's sense of sacrifice and self-discipline. They call out to every citizen to weigh his rights and comforts against his obligations to the common good. I cannot now believe that those citizens who serve in the newspaper business consider themselves exempt from that appeal.
     I have no intention of establishing a new Office of War Information to govern the flow of news. I am not suggesting any new forms of censorship or any new types of security classifications. I have no easy answer to the dilemma that I have posed, and would not seek to impose it if I had one. But I am asking the members of the newspaper profession and the industry in this country to reexamine their own responsibilities, to consider the degree and the nature of the present danger, and to heed the duty of self-restraint which that danger imposes upon us all.
     Every newspaper now asks itself, with respect to every story: "Is it news?" All I suggest is that you add the question: "Is it in the interest of the national security?" And I hope that every group in America--unions and businessmen and public officials at every level-- will ask the same question of their endeavors, and subject their actions to the same exacting tests.
     And should the press of America consider and recommend the voluntary assumption of specific new steps or machinery, I can assure you that we will cooperate whole-heartedly with those recommendations.
     Perhaps there will be no recommendations. Perhaps there is no answer to the dilemma faced by a free and open society in a cold and secret war. In times of peace, any discussion of this subject, and any action that results, are both painful and without precedent. But this is a time of peace and peril which knows no precedent in history.
II
     It is the unprecedented nature of this challenge that also gives rise to your second obligation--an obligation which I share. And that is our obligation to inform and alert the American people--to make certain that they possess all the facts that they need, and understand them as well--the perils, the prospects, the purposes of our program and the choices that we face.
     No President should fear public scrutiny of his program. For from that scrutiny comes understanding; and from that understanding comes support or opposition. And both are necessary. I am not asking your newspapers to support the Administration, but I am asking your help in the tremendous task of informing and alerting the American people. For I have complete confidence in the response and dedication of our citizens whenever they are fully informed.
     I not only could not stifle controversy among your readers--I welcome it. This Administration intends to be candid about its errors; for as a wise man once said: "An error does not become a mistake until you refuse to correct it." We intend to accept full responsibility for our errors; and we expect you to point them out when we miss them.
     Without debate, without criticism, no Administration and no country can succeed--and no republic can survive. That is why the Athenian lawmaker Solon decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy. And that is why our press was protected by the First Amendment-- the only business in America specifically protected by the Constitution- -not primarily to amuse and entertain, not to emphasize the trivial and the sentimental, not to simply "give the public what it wants"--but to inform, to arouse, to reflect, to state our dangers and our opportunities, to indicate our crises and our choices, to lead, mold, educate and sometimes even anger public opinion.
     This means greater coverage and analysis of international news--for it is no longer far away and foreign but close at hand and local. It means greater attention to improved understanding of the news as well as improved transmission. And it means, finally, that government at all levels, must meet its obligation to provide you with the fullest possible information outside the narrowest limits of national security--and we intend to do it.
III
     It was early in the Seventeenth Century that Francis Bacon remarked on three recent inventions already transforming the world: the compass, gunpowder and the printing press. Now the links between the nations first forged by the compass have made us all citizens of the world, the hopes and threats of one becoming the hopes and threats of us all. In that one world's efforts to live together, the evolution of gunpowder to its ultimate limit has warned mankind of the terrible consequences of failure.
     And so it is to the printing press--to the recorder of man's deeds, the keeper of his conscience, the courier of his news--that we look for strength and assistance, confident that with your help man will be what he was born to be: free and independent.

Tuesday, September 3, 2013

Sự Đểu Cáng của bọn Nhà Nuớc Âu Mỹ và Sự Ngu Dốt của bọn Độc Tài tí hon



Bọn Độc Tài "tí hon" của những xã hội thấp kém..cứ nghĩ rằng mình "ngầu"... Đâu biết rằng đang bị bọn Âu Mỹ sử dụng lũ ngu xuẩn bạo ngược này để phạm TỘI ÁC cho chúng nó... và sau này Chúng sẽ dùng ngay những TỘI ÁC đó làm lý cớ TRIỆT HẠ khi không cần dùng nữa...
===============
Pictures have emerged showing the US Secretary of State John Kerry dining with President Bashar al-Assad, as Mr Kerry continued to push for a military strike on Syria following a suspected chemical attack.
The images, believed to have been captured in Damascus in February 2009, come in stark contrast to comments Mr Kerry recently made about the Syrian president, describing him as a "thug" and drawing comparisons between Mr Assad and Adolf Hitler over their use of chemical weapons.
Mr Kerry was visiting the region when he was Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. He met with Mr Assad at least six times, according to The Daily Telegraph.
During the visit, he said in a press conference: “President Barack Obama's administration considers Syria a key player in Washington's efforts to revive the stalled Middle East peace process.
”Syria is an essential player in bringing peace and stability to the region".
The restaurant pictured is understood to be situated in Damascus' Old Town, where Mr Kerry and Mr Assad were joined by their wives Teresa Heinz and Asma al-Assad, the First Lady of Syria. 
Mr Kerry was also reportedly a strong supporter of the decision made by the US government to send an ambassador to Damascus in January 2011.










The US Government Stands Revealed to the World as a Collection of War Criminals and Liars

The US Government Stands Revealed to the World as a Collection of War Criminals and Liars

Paul Craig Roberts

Does the American public have the strength of character to face the fact that the US government stands before the entire world revealed as a collection of war criminals who lie every time that they open their mouth? Will Congress and the American public buy the White House lie that they must support war criminals and liars or “America will lose face”?

The obama regime’s lies are so transparent and blatant that the cautious, diplomatic President Putin of Russia lost his patience and stated the fact that we all already know: John Kerry is a liar. Putin said: "This was very unpleasant and surprising for me. We talk to them [the Americans], and we assume they are decent people, but he [Kerry] is lying and he knows that he is lying. This is sad."
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article36117.htm

When Secretary of State Colin Powell was sent by the criminal bush regime to lie to the UN, Powell and his chief of staff claim that Powell did not know he was lying. It did not occur to the Secretary of State that the White House would send him to the UN to start a war that killed, maimed, and dispossessed millions of Iraqis on the basis of total lies.

The despicable John Kerry knows that he is lying. Here is the American Secretary of State, and obama, the puppet president, knowingly lying to the world. There is not a shred of integrity in the US government. No respect for truth, justice, morality or human life. Here are two people so evil that they want to repeat in Syria what the bush war criminals did in Iraq.

How can the American people and their representatives in Congress tolerate these extraordinary criminals? Why are not obama and John Kerry impeached? The obama regime has every quality of Nazi Germany and Stasi Communist Germany, only that the obama regime is worse. The obama regime spies on the entire world and lies about it. The obama regime is fully engaged in killing people in seven countries, a murderous rampage that not even Hitler attempted.

Whether the criminal obama regime can purchase the collaboration of Congress and the European puppet states in a transparent war crime will soon be decided. The decision will determine the fate of the world.

As for facts, the report released to the UN by the Russian government concludes that the weapons used in chemical attacks in Syria are similar to the weapons in the hands of al-Nusra and are different from the weapons known to be possessed by Syria.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article36116.htm

The obama regime has released no evidence to the UN. This is because the criminal regime has no evidence, only made up fairy tales.

If the obama regime had any evidence, the evidence would have been released to British Prime Minister david cameron to enable him to carry the vote of Parliament. In the absence of evidence, cameron had to admit to Parliament that he had no evidence, only a belief that the Syrian government had used chemical weapons. Parliament told Washington’s puppet that the British people were not going to war on the basis of the Prime Minister’s unsubstantiated belief.

Are the American people and the rest of the world just going to stand there, sucking their thumbs, while a new Nazi State rises in Washington?

Congress must vote down the war and make it clear to obama that if he defies
the constitutional power of Congress he will be impeached.

If the US Congress is too corrupt or incompetent to do its duty, the rest of the world must join the UN General Secretary and the President of Russia and declare that unilateral military aggression by the US government is a war crime, and that the war criminal US government will be isolated in the international community. Any of its members caught traveling abroad will be arrested and turned over to the Hague for trial.


How to Stop Obama’s Military Aggression Against Syria — Paul Craig RobertsPaul Craig Roberts
Many are asking what can be done to stop the pending US attack on Syria.

Two things can be done.

One is for the US Congress to realize that it does not save America’s face for Congress
to endorse a policy that has been rejected by the rest of the world, including Washington’s closest ally, Great Britain. For Congress to endorse what the UN Secretary General and the President of Russia have made unequivocally clear would be a war crime under international law harms, not rescues, America’s reputation. Doing the wrong thing to save face does not succeed.

In the event that Congress fails to understand the real stakes and votes to support a criminal action, the second thing that can be done to stop the attack is for most other countries in the world--China, India, Japan, Brazil, Australia, Canada, Iran, South Africa, the European and South American countries--to add their clear unequivocal statements to those of the UN General Secretary and President Putin that an American attack on Syria that is not authorized by the UN Security Council is a war crime. Expression by the governments of the world of this truthful statement would make it clear to Washington that it is isolated from the world community. For Obama to proceed in an act of aggression in the face of united opposition would destroy all influence of the US government and make it impossible for any officials of the Obama regime to travel abroad or to conduct business with other governments. What government would conduct business with a war criminal government? It is up to the governments of the world to make it clear to Washington that the US government is not above the law and will be held accountable.

Note the reports from congressional offices of the total lack of any support for Obama's
attack on Syria. The entire world is now watching the obama regime demonstrate its total
disregard for the will of the people. The obama regime is showing that American democracy
is a hoax. http://www.wnd.com/2013/09/calls-to-congress-244-to-1-against-syria-war/

About Dr. Paul Craig Roberts
Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. His latest book, The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West is now available.

Sunday, September 1, 2013

Tâm Trạng Quân Lính Mỹ: Chính phủ Mỹ trơ trẽn đến nỗi binh lính cũng không ngửi nồi!

Tôi Không phải vào lính Hải Quân để Chiến Đấu cho bọn khủng bố Al Queda trong một cuộc Nội Chiến Syria!

(một hạ sĩ quan Hải Gân (NAVY) Mỹ)



The US Government Stands Revealed to the World as a Collection of War Criminals and Liars

Paul Craig Roberts

Does the American public have the strength of character to face the fact that the US government stands before the entire world revealed as a collection of war criminals who lie every time that they open their mouth? Will Congress and the American public buy the White House lie that they must support war criminals and liars or “America will lose face”?

The obama regime’s lies are so transparent and blatant that the cautious, diplomatic President Putin of Russia lost his patience and stated the fact that we all already know: John Kerry is a liar. Putin said: "This was very unpleasant and surprising for me. We talk to them [the Americans], and we assume they are decent people, but he [Kerry] is lying and he knows that he is lying. This is sad."
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article36117.htm

When Secretary of State Colin Powell was sent by the criminal bush regime to lie to the UN, Powell and his chief of staff claim that Powell did not know he was lying. It did not occur to the Secretary of State that the White House would send him to the UN to start a war that killed, maimed, and dispossessed millions of Iraqis on the basis of total lies.

The despicable John Kerry knows that he is lying. Here is the American Secretary of State, and obama, the puppet president, knowingly lying to the world. There is not a shred of integrity in the US government. No respect for truth, justice, morality or human life. Here are two people so evil that they want to repeat in Syria what the bush war criminals did in Iraq.

How can the American people and their representatives in Congress tolerate these extraordinary criminals? Why are not obama and John Kerry impeached? The obama regime has every quality of Nazi Germany and Stasi Communist Germany, only that the obama regime is worse. The obama regime spies on the entire world and lies about it. The obama regime is fully engaged in killing people in seven countries, a murderous rampage that not even Hitler attempted.

Whether the criminal obama regime can purchase the collaboration of Congress and the European puppet states in a transparent war crime will soon be decided. The decision will determine the fate of the world.

As for facts, the report released to the UN by the Russian government concludes that the weapons used in chemical attacks in Syria are similar to the weapons in the hands of al-Nusra and are different from the weapons known to be possessed by Syria.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article36116.htm

The obama regime has released no evidence to the UN. This is because the criminal regime has no evidence, only made up fairy tales.

If the obama regime had any evidence, the evidence would have been released to British Prime Minister david cameron to enable him to carry the vote of Parliament. In the absence of evidence, cameron had to admit to Parliament that he had no evidence, only a belief that the Syrian government had used chemical weapons. Parliament told Washington’s puppet that the British people were not going to war on the basis of the Prime Minister’s unsubstantiated belief.

Are the American people and the rest of the world just going to stand there, sucking their thumbs, while a new Nazi State rises in Washington?

Congress must vote down the war and make it clear to obama that if he defies
the constitutional power of Congress he will be impeached.

If the US Congress is too corrupt or incompetent to do its duty, the rest of the world must join the UN General Secretary and the President of Russia and declare that unilateral military aggression by the US government is a war crime, and that the war criminal US government will be isolated in the international community. Any of its members caught traveling abroad will be arrested and turned over to the Hague for trial.

Chính Trị Bang Giao Quốc Tế, Xét "Lý Thuyết" và "Tình Thật"

Khi não bộ đã bị chiếm cứ bằng niềm tin, nó không còn khả năng hoạt động theo tính luận ly chặt chẽ của con người đuợc nữa. Não bộ biến thành một chương trình điện toán đuợc viết ra để phản ứng với một quy trình (Algorithm)  sao cho phù hợp với một tiền đề đã định truớc, tương tự như phân loại 22 (class 22), đuợc thiết lập để qui vào một chọn lựa hay kết luận duy nhất đã đuợc định sẵn.
Xét vào ngay sự việc Syria:

Về "Lý:"

1- Chủ quyền quốc gia
a-Âu Mỹ không phải là cảnh sát thế giới. Ngay cả cảnh sát, theo nguyên tắc và nguyên lý, là ứng dụng thi hành luật định từ một tòa án và nền luật trị, trong trường hợp quốc tế này là Công Pháp Quốc Tế và Hội Đồng Bảo An LHQ  (HĐBALHQ) và Tòa Án Quốc Tế. 


 Nhưng vấn đề Syria là nội bộ trong vòng chủ quyền quốc gia, theo công pháp quốc tế và tuyên ngôn hiến chương LHQ, không quốc gia nào được can thiệp. Hơn nữa ngay cả nguyên tắc HĐBALHQ, cũng không có bằng chứng rõ rệt để 5 thành viên của HĐBALHQ đồng thuận. 

b- Hiên nay, phương Tây đứng đầu là  Mỹ, chỉ là những tên bạo nguợc- bất chấp luật lệ, cho dù là luật quốc gia hiến định hay công pháp quốc tế, tùy tiện làm theo ý riêng của chính phủ nhân danh "quyền lợi quốc gia (American interests).
 
2-Tội Ác Giết Nguời và Vũ Khí phạn tội.

 
Vấn đề thứ hai là Tội Ác Giết Nguời và Vũ Khí phạm tội. Khi tội ác với tội phạm là tàn sát thường dân, thì dù có là loại vũ khí nào đi chăng nữa, cũng vẫn là tội phạm giết người. Vậy vấn đề hóa học, nguyên tử, hay máy bay không người lái, hay cấm vận  mà gây tử thương hàng loạt cho thường dân vẫn bị qui là tội ác chống nhân loại.  
 
Trong những thập niên qua, Âu Mỹ và Do Thái đã giết hàng trăm ngàn nhân mạng! Âu Mỹ đã là phù thủy chữ nghĩa từ bao năm nay như Goerge Orwell đã vạch ra trong tác phẩm 1984. Chúng đẻ ra danh từ "vũ khí bất nhân"-inhumane weapons!!! Vũ khí nào nhân đạo??? Nguyên tử của Mỹ chăng? Hay Máy bay không người lái? Hay Hóa Vi Quang và tất cả những vũ khí làm tại Âu Mỹ? Hay chính sách "cấm vận" triệt hạ nguồn thuốc men lương thực đến dân chúng và trẻ em???
 
Trong khi luật pháp ở các xứ "văn minh", không chăm sóc hoặc bỏ đói CHÓ MÈO là PHẠM TỘI BẤT NHÂN inhumane acts!!!

3- Khi tội phạm là chế độ Assad hay chế độ Iran, thì giả thiết là biện pháp Trừng Phạt là đúng đắn cần thiết, như vậy nếu tấn công dội bom v.v  thì ai sẽ bị trừng phạt? Chế độ nhà nước chính trị Assad, Iran? Hay dân chúng trẻ em Syria, Iran?
 
Những tên "thủ phạm" sẽ không chết, không bị bom... mà bom đạn sẽ chỉ dội lên đầu dân, phá hủy nguồn cung cấp nhu cầu điện, nước, thực phẩm, bệnh viện v,v gây chết chóc khổ đau cho quần chúng nhân dân, những người mà Âu Mỹ và LHQ to mồm nhân danh bảo vệ họ, vì họ,  trừng phạt "kẻ tội phạm giết thường dân"? Cấm vận Iraq đã gây cho 500 ngàn trẻ em chết vì không đủ thức ăn và thuốc men. Cuối cùng trừng phạt hay không trừng phạt, bênh vực hay đồng lõa... NHÂN DÂN  TRẺ THƠ vẫn luôn là NẠN NHÂN của súng đạn của TẤT CẢ bọn nhà nước quân đội!
4- Vũ khí toàn diệt, nếu đã "bất hợp pháp", thì ngay Anh, Pháp, Mỹ, Nga, Hoa, Do Thái v.v cũng không được chế tạo, dĩ nhiên giả thiết là "pháp trị!". Thế nhưng 5 nước đầu xỏ LHQ không chỉ đầy đủ những loại vũ khí này, mà còn tinh luyện nó hàng ngày, càng ngày càng cao cấp, tế vi hơn dưới nhiều dạng thức kỹ thuật tân tiến, ngay cả lãnh vực chiến tranh thông tin điện toán, như Wikileaks và Snowden vừa vạch rõ cho cả nhân loại này chứng kiến.

Luân lý và công lý nào chấp nhận "luận cứ quái đản" này?

Về "tình":

Xét về "tình thật" của sự kiện, thì tất cả chỉ là những thủ đoạn chính trị của kẻ mạnh, của đế quốc, của bản chất nhà nước.
1-Chế độ Assad cũng như các chế độ độc tài "hồi giáo" mang tiếng là chống Âu Mỹ, nhưng thật sự chỉ là những trò tung hứng để đánh lừa quần chúng ngu ngơ với chủ nghĩa quốc gia dân tộc. Chế độ Assad đã hợp tác bí mật làm tay sai với Âu Mỹ từ lâu. Chế độ Assad từng nhận nhiệm vụ giam giữ và tra tấn nạn nhân "bị tình nghi là khủng bố cho CIA Mỹ trong chương trình "chuyển giao thẩm tra" của Mỹ (rendition) .

2- Âu Mỹ tung những tin "đối kháng" của chế độ Assad chống Âu Mỹ chỉ nhằm mục tiêu đóng kịch giúp Assad có "chính danh nghĩa" chống Mỹ và Do Thái theo "nguyện vọng" ngây ngô của đám quần chúng tín đồ của chủ nghĩa quốc gia dân tộc tại nội bộ bản xứ.

3- Khi không còn hữu dụng cho tiến trình quyền lực, Âu-Mỹ tìm đủ lý cớ vớ vẩn để triệt hạ như đã từng đối với Ngô Đình Diệm, Phác Chính Hy, Marcos, Sadam, Gadafi v.v

4- Ở Úc, vào cuối chiến cuộc VN, thủ tướng Gough Whitlam, chống chiến tranh và can thiệp nội bộ của Mỹ, cũng bị CIA và đám tay sai bảo thủ tại Úc lật đổ bằng cái gọi là "hiến luật tài chính" vào tháng 10 năm 1975.

 
5- Tây phương, đặc biệt Mỹ đã giúp Sadam Husein dùng vũ khí HÓA HỌC giết người Iran trong cuộc chiến 8 năm giữa Iran và Iraq. Và ngay cả trong vụ Sadam dùng vũ khí hóa học giết đối kháng Kurds Mỹ cũng giúp ngầm.
6- Chính các đại công ty Tây phương Âu Mỹ đã giúp Sadam Husein không chỉ xây dựng căn cứ mà còn trong lãnh vực vũ khí và quân sự, như Mỹ đã đào tạo và huấn luyện Osama Bin Laden và cái gọi là Al Qaeda- Mỹ từng nuôi dưỡng, hợp tác và giúp Taliban để chống Liên Xô cũng như toan tính tài nguyên tại khu vực này. (http://www.greenleft.org.au/node/26825)
7- Năm 1943, trong đệ nhị Thế chiến, Mỹ đã dùng vũ khí hóa học trong vụ chiến hạm SS John Harvey (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SS_John_Harvey)
8- Mỹ từng dùng chính người Mỹ da đen, các dân xứ Nam Mỹ để thử vũ khí hóa học và vi trùng!

9- Hiện nay, chính Anh-Mỹ và Do Thái là kẻ cung cấp vũ khí và vũ khí hóa học cho đám khủng bố phiến quân Salafi tại Syria! (http://nhanchu.org/comment/63#comment-63)
 
Quí độc giả muốn biết rõ tội ác của nhà nước Mỹ, xin tham khảo cuộc phỏng vấn cựu bộ trưởng quốc phòng Mỹ Robert McNamara "The Fog of War", những tội ác mà chính McNamara khi nhắc lại còn lắc đầu bật khóc-Và như nhà ngôn ngữ học Noam Chomsky đã nhận định
"Nếu như luật tội phạm chiến tranh của tòa án Nuremberg được áp dụng, thì tất cả những tên tổng thống Mỹ sau Thế chiến thứ Hai sẽ phải bị xử treo cổ- (If the Nuremberg laws were applied, then every post-war American president would have been hanged.)!
Xét gọn lại, Âu Mỹ chỉ là những tên vừa ăn cướp vừa la làng. Và những chế độ như Mubarak, Assad, Gadafi v.v chỉ là những tên độc tài bạo ngược nhưng ngu ngơ mà thôi. Tất cả đều là bọn nhà nước chính phủ với bản chất của chúng là như vậy.
Dưới áp lực dư luận phản chiến và thế cứng rắn từ Nga, Putin, sự việc Syria chỉ tạm đình hoãn mà thôi. Những màn đi đêm đang diển ra; những kế hoặch đang được tái phối trí, và sau khi thỏa hiệp chúng sẽ phải thực hiện để đạt mục tiêu cho bằng được với bất cứ giá nào. Chúng chỉ ngưng hẳn khi quyền lực chính trị hàng dọc bị triệt tiêu hoàn toàn mà thôi.

Hòa bình và tự do thật sự không bao giờ đến khi còn định chế Nhà nước. Nhà nước hình thành từ bạo lực và tồn tại với lý lẽ của chính nó trên nền tảng bằng bạo lực chiến tranh. Chiến tranh là trò làm tiền gian manh và là phương tiện hữu hiệu lâu bền nhất của quyền lực.

Không phải chỉ có những kẻ "dân sự an thân" là chống chiến tranh, mà chính những quân nhân với chiến bào đẫm máu, chiến công đầy vai, cũng nhìn rõ được bản chất của nó như:

Tướng Smedley Butler,

Chiến Tranh là trò làm tiền GIAN MANH. Nó lúc nào cũng vậy.Nó có thể là phương cách cổ xưa nhất, cách sinh lợi dễ dàng nhất, chắc chắn là cách độc ác nhất. Nó là cách duy nhất ở kích thước quốc tế. Nó là cách độc nhất mà lợi lộc được tính bằng đô-là và mất mát bằng sinh mạng con người. (WAR is a racket. It always has been. It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives.)
 
 Tướng Dwight D. Eisenhower (Đại Tướng , Tổng Thống Mỹ)  Tôi căm ghét Chiến Tranh chỉ vì Tôi là một người lính từng sống trong đó có thể ghét, chỉ vì là người đã thấy sự tàn bạo của nó, sư vô ích của nó, sự ngu xuẩn của nó....... Từng khẩu súng được chế tạo, từng chiến hạm ra khơi, từng trái pháo được bắn đi, biểu hiện trong một ý nghĩa cuối cùng là một hành động ăn cắp của những người đói khổ mà không có ăn, của những người chết rét mà không có mặc.. (I hate war as only a soldier who has lived it can, only as one who has seen its brutality, its futility, its stupidity.......Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired, signifies in the final sense a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. Four Star-General-President of The USA, Dwight D. Eisenhower)

Chỉ có những kẻ gian dối bất lương mới ủng hộ chiến tranh với những lý lẽ vớ vẩn ngược ngạo phi  lý như "Muốn có hòa bình phải chuẩn bị chiến tranh".
Albert Einstein chỉ một câu ngắn đã lột mặt nạ của ngụy luận này:

"Một đất nước không thể cùng một lúc vừa chuẩn bị và vừa ngăn chặn chiến tranh" (A country cannot simultaneously prepare and prevent war.)

nkptc

http://nhanchu.org/node/87