Nhân Chủ-Chủ Quyền Cá Nhân Con Người-Thượng Đế, Nhà Nước là Ảo Thể- Chúng Ta là Thực Thể- Không có Thượng Đế, Không có Nhà Nước, Chỉ có Chúng Ta, Tôi và Quí Vị phải Quyết Định Phương Cách Tự Trách Nhiệm Trao Đổi để Sống Chung Tự Do, Bình Đẳng với Nhau Mà Thôi!
As we all know by now, the entire corona crisis was and is an excuse for The Great Reset. And, as anyone who has followed the financial prognostication space for the past decade knows, “the great reset” has been used nearly interchangeably with “the global currency reset” to describe the collapse of the old dollar-centric Bretton Woods system and the rise of a new international monetary order.
It should come as no surprise, then, that the post-corona Great Reset being hyped by the World Economic Forum and their globalist fellow travelers is itself predicated on a global currency reset. But this global currency reset has a distinctly 21st-century technocratic flavour.
The form that this currency reset is taking reveals itself in the latest headlines from the world of central banking:
Yes, to the surprise of absolutely no one, the central banksters are
using “The Great Reset” as a smokescreen to smuggle through one of their
most cherished fantasies: the cashless society. Soon, central banks
will be issuing national digital currencies and tracking every single
transaction in the economy in real time.
And if you were able to read that last paragraph without feeling a
chill run down your spine, then you need to get up to speed on what the
cashless society entails and why it must be resisted with every last
fiber of our being.
First, the specifics.
The “digital dollar” that the US Senate banking committee is holding hearings about is the same digital dollar proposal that I talked about in my podcast on The Greatest Depression this past March. As you’ll recall, the Digital Dollar Project is being promoted by the World Economic Forum (surprise, surprise) and sold to the public via the old Cold War trick of “the Russkies Chinese are doing it, so we have to, too!”
Specifically, as the globalist crony insiders explained in their Wall Street Journal op ed on the idea last year:
“We propose a digital dollar—a government-sanctioned
blockchain protocol, created and maintained by an independent
nongovernmental group but administered by banks and other trusted
payment organizations. Cash brought into the system would be exchanged
for digital U.S. dollars on a blockchain, with the cash lodged in
special escrow accounts maintained by the Federal Reserve.”
In other words, the fine folks over at the Fed would be the invisible
counter-party watching lovingly over the digital money system. What
could possibly go wrong?
The digital dollar being proposed is a type of “Central Bank Digital
Currency” (CBDC), which the Bank for International Settlements (aka the
central bank of central banks) was writing about back in 2017. In fact, the idea goes back even further, to a proposed Fed-run central bank cryptocurrency called Fedcoin (I kid you not).
As I explained last year, the point of these “central bank digital currencies” is to take advantage of The Bitcoin Psyop
by presenting the cashless society as the cool, hip new spin on that
bitcoin/crypto thing all the cool kids are talking about. Of course,
this “Fedcoin” concept utterly subverts the very core impetus for
bitcoin and cryptocurrency right off the bat, a point highlighted and
underlined in the original “Fedcoin” proposal: “It (Fedcoin)
reintroduces one central point of control to the monetary system by
granting a central bank the ability to set the supply of tokens on a
Fedcoin blockchain.”
In other words: “Hey guys, you know that idea for making central
banks obsolete by taking the money creation power completely out of
their hands and bypassing all intermediaries in the banking system?
Well, this is exactly like that, except we’re going to put all the power
over this system in the hands of the central bank.”
Sadly, few in the public will even be able to see the blatant contradiction.
And, given that this is now being portrayed as some sort of monetary arms race with those dastardly Chinese and their proposed digital yuan, you can bet that a good portion of the public will embrace this new currency with open arms.
As researcher Steven Guinness has been meticulously documenting
at his blog over the last several months, this introduction of central
bank digital currencies in England and elsewhere is being fast-tracked
by the Bank for International Settlements on the back of the World
Economic Forum’s “Great Reset” agenda and is slated to be ready by 2025. The current scamdemic pandemonium only further helps to prepare the public to get ready to trade in their filthy, virus-laden cash for healthy virtual Fedcoins.
But still, this may just seem like a technological upgrade to our
payment systems. People increasingly pay with cards or payment apps
anyway, so what difference does it make if we eliminate cash altogether?
I have done a lot of work on the cashless society over the years, but
it’s one of those concepts that is so large and so difficult to
envision in its entirety that it’s worth revisiting here. To get a sense
of how the cashless society is not about payment convenience but about
control over every aspect of your lives, watch this short video that the
ACLU put out a decade and a half ago:
This video wasn’t even meant to warn about the cashless society. The
hapless victim of this pizza transaction ends up being forced to pay in
cash because his credit card is maxed out. But the rest of the video is
the vision of the cashless society in a nutshell. In the cashless
society, your entire payment history and all of the information that is
tied into that history will be plainly visible to those who have access
to it. And if the government issues a decree about what you are or are
not able to purchase, that decree will be enforced at the point of sale.
At that point, freedom will only be found in the counter-economy.
If you want to get a handle on what such a future will look like, imagine the following scenario:
You are out for a walk late at night. You come to a red light, but
there is no one around. You hesitate a moment, double-check that there
is really no one in sight and then dash across the intersection. In the
two seconds it takes you to cross the road, a large LED screen above the
street lights up with your picture and your name. Two seconds after
that you feel a buzz in your pocket. Taking out your phone you find a
message from your bank informing you that you have been fined for
jaywalking and that your social credit score has been reduced.
The next day, you’re at the airport, preparing to board a flight to
visit your family on the other side of the country. When you go to check
in you receive a message that your social credit score is too low and
you will not be allowed to board the plane. Enraged, you curse the
airline, the government’s social credit system, its jaywalking laws, and
even the government itself.
Unbeknownst to you, someone has recorded your outburst and uploads it
to social media, where you are quickly identified. The police come to
your home the next day and take you downtown where you are shackled in a
chair and made to recant your statements about the government.
Sound like something out of a dystopian sci-fi novel? Well, it’s not.
It’s just a mundane portrayal of everyday life in current day China.
Facial recognition deployed to monitor the streets and automatically issue fines for jaywalking and other minor infractions? Check.
Social credit scores tied in to your ability to board public transportation or access government services? Check.
Police hauling people in for angrily ranting about the government and shackling them until they recant? Check.
The cashless society is about so much more than just how we pay for
things at the store. Tied into a system of persistent technological
surveillance, it represents the ultimate control over our lives. Can
there be any doubt as to why the World Economic Forum and the Bank for
International Settlements are working in concert with the central banks
of the world and organizations like the Bill Gates-co-founded Better Than Cash Alliance to pave the way for this nightmare to become a reality?
As the world grows accustomed to “The New Normal” and the
Predator Class calls for “The Great Reset”, we must ask where humanity
is headed and who is the driving force?
Clearly, 2020 has been unlike any previous year in the last century
or so. The world is currently battling against an infodemic of
propaganda spewing from the corporate media and official health
authorities. Yes, people are sick and dying. However, the statistics
make it clear that COVID-19 simply does not warrant a total lockdown of
the planet and further destruction of the economy.
Regardless, nations around the world are using COVID-19 as an
opportunity to grab more surveillance and police state powers, institute
mask and vaccine mandates, accelerate the push towards a completely
digital world, enact more corporate bailouts, and generally, extreme
control and involvement in citizens lives. The sheer magnitude of the
COVID-19 operation is unparalleled, with the most recent similar event
being the attacks of September 11, 2001. As with the 9/11 attacks, the
predator class is using COVID-19 as the excuse to push plans and agendas
which predate the spread of the novel coronavirus.
Even so, the COVID-19 operation is unlike any other event to take
place in modern history because the results of this event are affecting
people in every single nation on the planet and will continue to for
years to come. Also, unlike 9/11 – which took place over the course of
one morning – the COVID-19 operation is taking place daily for months on
end. The effects of this constant bombardment with fear and panic are
taking a toll on the hearts and minds of free people all around the world. Quite simply, the people are ready for this to end and they will do almost anything to achieve this goal.
It is within this space of fear and uncertainty which the predator
class has now begun to insert themselves, ready to present the
“solution” to our ills.
The Great Reset
As every student of power and deception knows, the easiest way to
achieve victory over your opponent is to guide them to a predetermined
destination which benefits your agenda. If you can do this while
convincing your opponent that they are consciously making their own
choices and the path is for their own good – well, you are all but
guaranteed success. I believe the evidence indicates this is the
strategy we are seeing unfold during the COVID-19 operation.
The predetermined path we are being led down is known as “The Great Reset” and was announced in early June
by the World Economic Forum. Regular readers will remember that on
October 18, 2019, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation partnered with
the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security and the WEF on a high-level
pandemic exercise known as Event 201. Event 201 simulated how the world
would respond to a coronavirus pandemic which swept around the planet.
The simulation imagined 65 million people dying, mass lock downs,
quarantines, censorship of alternative viewpoints under the guise of
fighting “disinformation,” and even floated the idea of arresting people
who question the pandemic narrative.
The launch of The Great Reset was supported by Klaus Schwab, the founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum;
England’s Prince Charles; Antonio Guterres, Secretary-General of the
UN; and Kristalina Georgieva of the International Monetary Fund. The
kick-off was truly an international event with the participation of Ma
Jun, the chairman of the Green Finance Committee at the China Society
for Finance and Banking and a member of the Monetary Policy Committee of
the People’s Bank of China. The event was also supported by Bernard
Looney, CEO of BP; Ajay Banga, CEO of Mastercard; and Bradford Smith,
president of Microsoft.
During the launch of The Great Reset, Prince Charles stated that humanity cannot waste time because “we need to put nature at the heart of how we operate.” UN Secretary-General Guterres called for “more equal, inclusive and sustainable economies and societies” that can face pandemics, climate change, and other global challenges.
In an opinion piece published in The Globe and Mail, Klaus Schwab provided more details on the goals of The Great Reset (emphasis added):
“COVID-19 lockdowns may be gradually easing, but anxiety about the world’s social and economic prospects is only intensifying. There
is good reason to worry: a sharp economic downturn has already begun,
and we could be facing the worst depression since the 1930s. But,
while this outcome is likely, it is not unavoidable. To achieve a better
outcome, the world must act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects
of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and
working conditions. Every country, from the United States to China,
must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be
transformed. In short, we need a “Great Reset” of capitalism.”
Schwab goes on to describe several crises facing humanity, including
rising government debt, unemployment, and increasing social unrest.
Combined with COVID-19, these crises will leave the world less
sustainable, less equal and more fragile. “We must build entirely new foundations for our economic and social systems,”
Schwab writes. He details the 3 main components of TGR agenda,
specifically fairer market outcomes, investments in “equality and
sustainability,” and harnessing the innovations of the Fourth Industrial
Revolution.
When it comes to producing “fairer market outcomes,” Schwab calls for
governments to improve coordination in tax, regulatory, and fiscal
policy. He also calls for upgrading trade agreements and moving towards a
“stakeholder economy.” When he speaks of equality and sustainability,
Schwab means that current and future government stimulus and relief
packages should be used to create a new system that is “more resilient,
equitable and sustainable.” He also calls for more “green” urban
infrastructure and incentivizing industries to improve their
environmental record.
Finally, Schwab calls for utilizing the innovations of “the Fourth Industrial Revolution”
to support public good. The 4IR is another pet project of Schwab which
was first announced in December 2015. To put it simply, the 4IR is the
digital panopticon of the future, where digital surveillance is
omnipresent and humanity uses digital technology to alter and,
hopefully, improve our lives. Sometimes known as “The Internet of
Things,” this world will be powered by 5G and 6G technology.
“Ubiquitous, mobile supercomputing. Intelligent robots.
Self-driving cars. Neuro-technological brain enhancements. Genetic
editing. The evidence of dramatic change is all around us and it’s
happening at exponential speed,” Schwab wrote for the announcement of the 4IR.
Of course, for Schwab and other globalists, the 4IR also lends itself
towards more central planning and top-down control. The goal is a track
and trace society where all transactions are logged, every person has a
digital ID that can be tracked, and social malcontents are locked out
of society via social credit scores.
In fact, much of this call for a Great Reset is already playing out.
For example, Mastercard and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation-funded
GAVI recently announced a partnership with AI-powered “identity
authentication” company, Trust Stamp. As MintPress News reported, “The program, which was first launched
in late 2018, will see Trust Stamp’s digital identity platform
integrated into the GAVI-Mastercard “Wellness Pass,” a digital
vaccination record and identity system that is also linked to Mastercard’s click-to-play system that powered by its AI and machine learning technology called NuData.”
This is why astute readers are skeptical when they hear Schwab say, “the
pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect,
reimagine, and reset our world to create a healthier, more equitable
and more prosperous future.”
Who exactly is Schwab speaking to when he speaks of a more prosperous future? How long has this Great Reset been in the works? The answers to these questions can help us understand the true goals of this agenda.
As researcher Brandon Smith reported, Christine Lagarde, former head of the IMF, discussed a global reset as far back as 2014.“The
reset is often mentioned in the same breath as ideas like “the New
Multilateralism” or “the Multipolar World Order” or “the New World
Order.” All of these phrases mean essentially the same thing,”Smith writes.
Smith correctly notes that the Great Reset is not a response to the pandemic, but rather, “the
global reset as implemented by central banks and the BIS/IMF is the
cause of the collapse. The collapse is a tool, a flamethrower burning a
great hole in the forest to make way for the foundations of the
globalist Ziggurat to be built.”
New Normal, Same World Order
In early July, Schwab and French author Thierry Malleret released a
book outlining the vision of The Great Reset. The book, Covid-19: The
Great Reset, explores what the post-pandemic world might look like. “Will
there be enough collective will to take advantage of this unprecedented
opportunity to reimagine our world, in a bid to make it a better and
more resilient one as it emerges on the other side of this crisis?,” Schwab and Malleret pondered at the release of the book. The two men believe COVID-19 triggered “momentous changes and magnified the fault lines that already beset our economies and societies.”
They also predict that falling oil prices and a freeze in tourism could
lead to a wave of massive anti-government demonstrations.
“One path will take us to a better world: more inclusive, more
equitable and more respectful of Mother Nature. The other will take us
to a world that resembles the one we just left behind – but worse and
constantly dogged by nasty surprises,” the authors argue.
In the book, Schwab expands upon the initial announcement of The
Great Reset. Once again he calls for the 4th Industrial Revolution and
the digitalization of everything, powered by 5G technology. However,
Schwab goes even further in his book, calling for rethinking the “social
contract” society has with governments.
Schwab also calls for a nature based or green economy. In January 2020, the WEF released their report, Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy, as part of their New Nature Economy series of reports. The report is “the
first of a series of New Nature Economy reports, prepared through the
Nature Action Agenda, a platform that aims to encourage a movement of
businesses, governments, civil society, academics, innovators and youth
to disrupt business-as-usual approaches.”
A second report, The Future of Nature and Business, was released in July. Once again, the WEF states that COVID-19 presents an “opportunity,
to change the way we eat, live, grow, build and power our lives to
achieve a carbon-neutral, ‘nature-positive’ economy and halt
biodiversity loss by 2030. Business as usual is no longer an option.“
In a companion report, the WEF provides some detail on what it means to change the way we eat. “Another
set of policy measures that would stimulate more resource-efficient
food systems entail directing stimulus packages towards R&D to
support the diversification away from diets based on resource intensive
animal proteins, and towards four main categories of alternatives –
aquatic, plant-based, insect-based and laboratory-cultured,” the
report states. This push for alternatives to animal proteins has
coincided with a rise in laboratory created fake meat, including
products funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Interestingly, the companion report also calls for “corporate bailout
packages for the meat sector” which “could accelerate these
developments.” Coincidentally, because of COVID-19, the Trump
administration awarded $15.5 billion
in relief aid for the meat and dairy industry. Once again, the
predictions and declarations of these global institutions appear to play
out in reality as perfect as any scripted TV show.
The calls for a Great Reset greatly mimic previous programs and
initiatives put forward by other globalist organizations, including the
United Nations. Researcher F. William Engdahl provided much-needed
clarity in a recent piece on the announcement of The Great Reset.
Engdahl notes that, “the
declaration by the World Economic Forum to make a Great Reset is to all
indications a thinly-veiled attempt to advance the Agenda 2030
“sustainable” dystopian model, a global “Green New Deal” in the wake of
the covid19 pandemic measures. Their close ties with Gates Foundation
projects, with the WHO, and with the UN suggest we may soon face a far
more sinister world after the covid19 pandemic fades.”
Strategic Intelligence, Strategic Partners, and Event 201
In March, the WEF launched the COVID Action Platform
which is essentially a call for global government in response to
COVID-19. The answer, WEF believes, is to have greater global
cooperation, move away from the nation-state, and tackle the world’s
problems as one international community.
Along with the launch of the Action Platform, the WEF released an impressive graphic
as part of their “Strategic Intelligence” platform, which outlines the
wide ranging ways their plans will effect and shape the world of the
21st century and beyond. From the media’s role in the pandemic to
finding a vaccine, the graphic attempts to provide details on this
centrally planned future being promoted by the WEF. I encourage all
readers to spend an evening going down the rabbit hole that is the COVID
Action Platform for a better understanding of where we are headed.
With the launch of The Great Reset, the WEF also launched a Strategic Intelligence graphic
detailing how their plans will unfold. The Great Reset graphic details
how everything from drones, blockchain, the future of energy, LGBTI
inclusion, and 3D printing will play a role in the New Normal. Once
again, I encourage readers to take a dive into this graphic to gain
clarity on what the WEF and their partners have planned for the coming
decade.
The WEF promotes itself as the “International Organization for
Public-Private Cooperation.” They partner with a variety of private
companies, philanthropic outlets, and governments to achieve their
goals. Researcher Steven Guinness recently outlined how the WEF partners
with various institutions to accomplish their stated aims and how the
Strategic Intelligence platform is “co-curated with leading topic experts from academia, think tanks, and international organizations.”
“‘Co-curators‘ are perhaps the most important aspect to consider
here, given that they have the ability to ‘share their expertise with
the Forum’s extensive network of members, partners and constituents, as
well as a growing public audience,’”Guinness writes.“It
is safe to assume then that when co-curators speak, members and
partners of the World Economic Forum listen. This in part is how the
WEF’s agenda takes shape.”
As Guinness notes, the co-curators of the Strategic Intelligence road
map of the globalist vision include Harvard university, the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Imperial College London, Oxford
University, Yale and the European Council on Foreign Relations. Several
of these institutions continue to play an influential role in shaping
the narrative around COVID-19.
The WEF’s highest level of partnership is known as Strategic Partners.
There are only 100 international companies listed as Strategic
Partners. Each partner receives an invitation if they have “alignment
with forum values.” These partners “shape the future through extensive
contribution to developing and implementing Forum projects and
championing public-private dialogue.”
The WEF’s Strategic Partners include Johnson & Johnson, and the
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Bill Gates is also a long time “Agenda Contributor”
for the WEF. As mentioned above, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
partnered with the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security and the WEF
on the Event 201 pandemic exercise in October 2019. Johnson &
Johnson were also partners in the exercise.
As TLAV’s has previously documented,
the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation operates in a similar fashion to
the WEF: their publicly stated goals mask a global control agenda. Thus,
it should come as no surprise that Klaus Schwab, founder of the WEF, is
a former attendee and member of the Steering Committee for the secretive Bilderberg Group.
The WEF itself is akin to a more public Bilderberg Group which brings
together around 3,000 business leaders, international political
leaders, economists, celebrities, and journalists for a five day
conference to discuss global issues. The WEF meets every January in
Davos, Switzerland, to discuss their agenda. The elitism of the WEF has
resulted in Schwab and his cohorts being nicknamed The Davos Class.
In January 2021 the theme of the WEF meeting will be “The Great
Reset.” It’s important that we keep an eye on the WEF and their push for
the Great Reset as we draw closer to election 2020 and a potential Dark Winter.
Klaus Schwab, Bill Gates, and their ilk are determined to present
themselves as the saviors of humanity. They are using the COVID-19 panic
as an opportunity to push their agenda while selling it as the cure to
our problems.
This predator class attempts to mask their true intentions with
flowery language designed to lull the waking masses back to sleep. To be
clear, our world is absolutely, without a doubt existing in an
unsustainable paradigm. We do have growing income inequality, police
violence, failing healthcare systems, and insufficient food production
systems. These problems were apparent before COVID-19 and the fragility
of these systems has indeed become more obvious in recent months.
However, these psychopaths would prefer if we allowed them to stay in
the driver’s seat as they careen us into a future of technocratic
control and the end of individual liberty.
While Schwab and Gates would prefer that the people of the world
submit to their vision, we must stand against this push for
centralization of power and technology. The Great Reset is coming, and
perhaps, it should come. We have many issues facing our species that
need to be addressed. However, central planning, surveillance, and loss
of individual liberty is not the answer. The answer is decentralization,
opting out en masse, non-compliance, and non-participation in the
systems which have brought us to this predicament.
We, as free people, must decide what path we intend to take. Will
we stand by and allow the predators to seize control of all resources
and power for the coming generations? Or, will we finally break free
from their violent systems and initiate a Great Reset which benefits the
people, from bottom to top?
The answer depends on you.
Question Everything, Come To Your Own Conclusions.
(BERLIN) — Thousands protested Germany’s coronavirus restrictions Saturday in a Berlin demonstration that insisted “the end of the pandemic” has arrived — a declaration that comes just as authorities are voicing increasing concerns about an uptick in new infections.
With few masks in sight, a dense crowd marched through downtown Berlin from the Brandenburg Gate.
Protesters who came from across the country held up homemade signs with slogans like “Corona, false alarm,” “We are being forced to wear a muzzle,” “Natural defense instead of vaccination” and “We are the second wave.”
They chanted, “We’re here and we’re loud, because we are being robbed of our freedom!”
Police used bullhorns to chide participants to adhere to social distancing rules and to wear masks, apparently with little success. They tweeted that they drew up a criminal complaint against the rally’s organizer for failing to enforce hygiene rules, then said shortly afterward that the organizer had ended the march.
Police estimated that about 17,000 people turned out. The demonstrators were kept apart from counterprotesters, some chanting “Nazis out!”
Protests against anti-virus restrictions in Germany have long drawn a variety of attendees, including conspiracy theorists and right-wing populists.
Unlike the U.S., Brazil and Britain, Germany’s government has been praised worldwide for its management of the pandemic. The country’s death toll — just over 9,150 people out of more than 210,670 confirmed virus cases as of Saturday – is five times less than Britain’s, which has a smaller population.
The German government has been easing lockdown measures since late April but social distancing rules remain in place, as does a requirement to wear masks on public transit and in shops.
Officials have been warning against complacency as the number of new COVID-19 cases crept up recently. They pleaded with Germans this week to observe the distancing and mask rules and, amid concern about residents bringing home infections from summer trips abroad, introduced free tests for people entering the country.
Germany’s national disease control center registered 955 new cases Friday, a high figure by recent standards.
“Thousands of #covidiots are celebrating themselves in Berlin as ‘the second wave,’ without distancing, without masks,” tweeted Saskia Esken, a co-leader of the Social Democrats, the junior party in Germany’s governing coalition.
“They are not just endangering our health, they are endangering our success against the pandemic and for the revival of the economy, education and society. Irresponsible!”
