Khoản 1- Lãnh địa của Đại Sứ không được XÂM PHẠM. Nhân viên GIỚI CHỨC của nước SỞ TẠI KHÔNG ĐƯỢC tiến vào lãnh địa đại sú trừ khi có sự ĐỒNG THUẬN của TRƯỞNG CƠ QUAN ĐẠI SỨ.
Khoản 2- Chính phủ nước sở tại phải có bổn phận đặc biệt BẢO VỆ LÃNH ĐỊA ĐẠI SỨ bằng mọi cách phù hợp để chống lại bất cứ hành động xâm nhập nào hay tác hại nào và ngăn chặn bất cứ sự quấy phá mất an bình cũng như làm phương hại đến tư thế phẩm cách của đại sứ.
Khoản 3- Lãh địa tài sản phương tiện di chuyển của đại sứ sẽ được mien xâm phạm lục xét, tịch thu, ràng buộc,, truy hồi hay truy tố..
Điều 24, 27.29.34 qui định thêm những phương thức điều kiện bảo vệ tôn trọng các nhân viên liên hệ , văn phòng hồ sơ đặt NGOÀI LÃNH ĐỊA ĐẠI SỨ cũng như đặt ra những PHƯƠNG TIỆN THÔNG TIN TRAO ĐỔI giữa hai quốc gia của đại sứ..
Aricle 22:
1.The premises of the mission shall be inviolable. The agents of the receiving State may not enter
them, except with the consent of the head of the mission.
2.The receiving State is under a special duty to take all appropriate steps to protect the premises
of the mission against any intrusion or damage and to prevent any disturbance of the peace of the
mission or impairment of its dignity.
3.The premises of the mission, their furnishings and other property thereon and the means of
transport of the mission shall be immune from search, requisition, attachment or execution.http://untreaty.un.org/cod/avl/ha/vcdr/vcdr.html
Article 22 confirms the inviolability of mission premises – barring any right of entry by law enforcement officers of the receiving State and imposing on the receiving State a special duty to protect the premises against intrusion, damage, disturbance of the peace or infringement of dignity. Even in response to abuse of this inviolability or emergency, the premises may not be entered without the consent of the head of mission. Article 24 ensures the inviolability of mission archives and documents – even outside mission premises – so that the receiving State may not seize or inspect them or permit their use in legal proceedings.
Article 27 guarantees free communication between a mission and its sending State by all appropriate means, and ensures that the diplomatic bag carrying such communications may not be opened or detained even on suspicion of abuse. Given the purposes of diplomatic missions, secure communication for information and instructions is probably the most essential of all immunities.
Article 29 provides inviolability for the person of diplomats and article 31 establishes their immunity from civil and criminal jurisdiction – with precise exceptions to immunity from civil jurisdiction where previous State practice had varied. Immunity from jurisdiction – like other immunities and privileges – may be waived by the sending State, and article 32 specifies the rules on waiver. Article 34 sets out the tax exemption accorded to diplomats along with detailed exceptions in respect of matters unrelated to their official duties or to ordinary life in the receiving State. Article 36 provides for exemption from customs duties on diplomatic imports throughout a diplomat’s posting.
Articles 37 sets out a complex code for the treatment of families and junior staff – where as pointed out above previous practice was varied and negotiation of a compromise difficult. Article 38 bars from all privileges and immunities, except for immunity for their official acts, nationals and permanent residents of the receiving State. These two provisions in many States drastically reduced the numbers of those persons more likely to bring into disrepute the system of privileges and immunities and were fully in accordance with the basic justification applied throughout the Convention of limiting immunities to what is essential to ensure the efficient performance of the functions of diplomatic missions as representing States.
No comments:
Post a Comment